\"Writing.Com
*Magnify*
Printed from https://p15.writing.com/main/profile/reviews/mathguy/sort_by/r.review_creation_time DESC/page/6
Review Requests: ON
1,686 Public Reviews Given
3,179 Total Reviews Given
Review Style
In depth, detailed, and supportive.
I'm good at...
Elements of craft that draw readers into your fictional world and your character's head.
Favorite Genres
SciFi, Mystery, Thriller, Horror
Least Favorite Genres
Fantasy
Favorite Item Types
Short stories
Least Favorite Item Types
nonfiction, poetry
I will not review...
I'm only interested in prose fiction. I will not review anything over 4000 words, nor will i review poetry. If you have a longer piece, please divide it into bite-sized chunks.
Public Reviews
Previous ... 2 3 4 5 -6- 7 8 9 10 11 ... Next
126
126
Review by Author IconMail Icon
Rated: E | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC ContestOpen in new Window..

Item Reviewed: "The Valley of FearOpen in new Window.
Author Lisa Noe Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
This is an awesome ghost story! I loved the plot, which weaves together all the elements to a satisfying ending.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (15/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. There is some lovely prose and evocative description in your opening paragraph, but it's written with an omniscient narrator. It's not until paragraph four, where Cameran's heart races, that we're in her head and she becomes the POV character. So, while I like the opening paragraph, I think it would be stronger if you could tweak it so that it's Cameran seeing the hills and the fog.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (8/10 points)
This is mostly third person limited in Cameran's head, except that the first three paragraphs all use an omniscient narrator, standing outside the story, looking in, and telling the reader things. In another place, you're in the head of the younger Pratt when he recognizes the ghost.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(12/20 points)
Where you show things, you do an effective job of it, as in
. Her heart began to race, beating faster by the minute.

This passage does a great job of showing that she's afraid. In other places, however, you tell the reader things. An example would be the second paragraph where you tell readers she's young and give a bit of her background. Rather than narrating this history--which is certainly essential to the story--it's better to devise ways to reveal these kinds of things through the words and deeds of the characters.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (18/20 points)
This is a really great plot! I liked it a lot.

Structurally, however, some of the elements seemed coincidental. For example, we learn about the ghost story after she hears the scary sounds in the forest. If we knew about the story before she entered the forest, then the reader will anticipate the appearance of the ghost which adds tension to the plot.

Indeed, while you've got all the elements necessary to have a *lot* of tension, the story feels rather flat. Because you've told us about Cameran's plight, we don't feel her desperation, her anger, or her frustration. She has a clear goal: justice. It matters, since she's lost everything. The obstacles are criminal's connection to the sheriff. The conflict between her goal and the obstacle should lead to tension, but it's only mentioned in passing in the second paragraph.

Similarly, the ghost has a goal that matters, and the obvious obstacle is that she's dead and can't seek out her killer on her own. But, again, but the presentation is devoid of emotion. It's presented more as a puzzle than an urgent need.

Tension is the engine that drives plot forward, and the emotional reactions of the characters are what show the tension cranking ever tighter.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (18/20 points)
Both of the main characters--Cameran and the ghost--are great characters, with goals that matter and cogent obstacles.

I'm not sure why you chose the name of a famous actor--Chris Pratt--for your villain.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (5/10 points)
There are a few typos (worst for worse, "both...was," "screemed"). There are also a couple of comma splices, which occur when two sentences are joined by a comma rather than being separated by a period or semicolon.

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 76/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
127
127
Review of The Return  Open in new Window.
Review by Author IconMail Icon
Rated: E | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC ContestOpen in new Window..

Item Reviewed: "The ReturnOpen in new Window.
Author Espinado Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
I liked the dizzying pace and surreal scenes. You did an awesome job of description in this story!

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (15/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. The opening paragraphs launch the story by embedding the readers inside your fictional world and stimulating them to imagine, in partnership with you, the details. One of the most effective ways to do this is by putting the readers inside the head of your point-of-view character.

Eventually, readers are deeply in Eric's head, especially after he wakes in the hotel. However, this is a flashback from the opening paragraphs, which were a bit cryptic. Indeed, I'd suggest starting with him waking rather than having the little time-reversal at the beginning which runs the risk of confusing readers and pulling them out of the here-and-now of the story.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (10/10 points)
First person, in Eric's head. No slips.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(15/20 points)
You mostly do a great job of showing, especially Eric's emotional state. Here and there, though, bits of telling show up, as when you tell us the "air is invigorating." There is a repetitive flavor to the descriptions, too, with seven instances of "there are" or "there is."

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (18/20 points)
Eric has two related goals: recover his memory and live long enough to do so. The goals obviously matter, so the stakes are high. The obstacles are many and varied, and increase in scope and danger. This means that the tension increases throughout, so the plot has a real dynamic and urgent feel.

However, although I'm an admirer of Zelazny, I'm unfamiliar with the Amber universe. Thus, the punch line was a pretty big let-down for me. Being unfamiliar, I missed the foreshadowing you wove into the story with names like Brand and Flora as well. In any case, the ending felt rather disappointing after the great build-up.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (20/20 points)
Eric is a great character.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (10/10 points)
While I don't read for grammar or other issues, I almost always find things to complain about. Not so here--this copy looked clean to me.

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 88/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
128
128
Review of Trespassers  Open in new Window.
Review by Author IconMail Icon
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC ContestOpen in new Window..

Item Reviewed: "TrespassersOpen in new Window.
Author Myles Abroad Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
There is much to love about this story, with evocative descriptions and deep emotional connections. I think I liked this phrase best:
Now we were trespassers into each other's hearts.

It captured perfectly the relationship between these two lonely souls.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (18/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. You do an awesome job of putting the reader in Jane's head by using subjective descriptions of the cold and the dog. There's evidence of an experienced author exercising craft here. My only wish would be that you revealed Jane's name in the opening, since that's one way to solidify the readers' connections to her.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (10/10 points)
First person, in Jane's head. Perfection.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(18/20 points)
I think perhaps the 2000 word limit worked a bit against this story. You used them effectively to show the isolation and loneliness of both characters, and how they touched each other over time. But critical elements of Jane's story wind up being narrated--told--instead of revealed in the words and deeds of the characters. You weave this skillfully into the narrative, but there's an inevitable distancing from narrating their conversations instead of showing them.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (20/20 points)
Absolutely awesome. You don't ever explicitly say what Jane's goals are, but you don't need to: it's implicit in her deeds, and in her connection to the old man. Her goals--to surmount loneliness and make a human connection--are so basic that readers understand the stakes are high for both her and Ned. The obstacles, of course, are the most difficult to overcome since they are all inside her.

I admit that I guessed at the ending fairly early in the story, but that's the author in me spotting craft at work in your story. Most readers won't see the subtle signs, but they will resonate nonetheless.

Initially, I was tempted to suggest a more linear timeline for the story, but I think your episodic approach works well. The transitions from the fictional past to the fictional present are generally clear and you shouldn't lose readers in the process.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (20/20 points)
Again, really great craft in evidence here.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (9/10 points)
I found one typo--"storey" for "story"--although this may be the UK spelling. I also found one sentence that I had to read twice to get the meaning: "A grey ponytailed gnarled old coot glared down at me." That piled too many adjectives together, and for clarity I'd consider a revision.


                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 95/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
129
129
Review by Author IconMail Icon
Rated: ASR | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC ContestOpen in new Window..

Item Reviewed: "Legend of the Sacred TreeOpen in new Window.
Author brom21 Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
I appreciated the numerous Biblical references and felt that they added depth to the story.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (15/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. Some of the primary tasks of an opening are to orient the readers in space and time and to establish the point-of-view. Starting with disembodied dialogue vitiates these goals.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (8/10 points)
Third person limited. Eventually, the story settles into Niethos' point of view and stays there.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(17/20 points)
In many places, the prose is vivid and evocative. However, I found quite a bit of telling in this story, too. This ranged from "an unusually large fig tree" ("unusually large" doesn't give scale for those who have never seen a fig tree), to state of mind--"Niethos was sad." Consistently showing as opposed to telling requires relentless attention and is one of the hardest things to do. It's worth it, though, as the places where show the setting or the actions really shine.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (15/20 points)
Truthfully, I found the plot a little thin, or at least hard to believe. Initially, we see Niethos determined to eat from the tree, so much so that he defies his father, the king. The plot, then, is about the conflict between his goal and his father's wishes. It deepens when the angel appears and tells him "no" as well. This should increase the tension. But insteand when the angel says, "No, because your parents sinned," and Niethos immediately relents. I can understand him acquiescing--after all, he's being told by an angel--but for verisimilitude there should be at least some conflict in him before he abandons his goal. This lack of conflict at what should be the climax dissipates the energy in the story without really releasing it.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (15/20 points)
Niethos is the main character here, but I thought you could clarify his motivations a bit more.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (6/10 points)
There were several minor typos, and other places where the word choices didn't seem quite right. For example, I think you meant "thunderclap" instead of "thunder clasped" and "revere" instead of "reverence." There were a few other places as well--nothing major. I have a hard time proof-reading, too. Sometimes it helps to read your copy line-by-line, but backwards, starting at the end.

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 76/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
130
130
Review by Author IconMail Icon
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC ContestOpen in new Window..

Item Reviewed: "A Darkness in the TreesOpen in new Window.
Author Graham B. Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
I know I've seen this plot before. I don't care. I loved it in all those teen-horror movies, and I loved it here. It has it's own logic and grim morality, and you've executed it flawlessly. Kudos!

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (17/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. Among other tasks, the opening needs to orient the readers in time and space and establish the point of view. Eventually, you get there, but starting with disembodied voices speaking vitiates these goals.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (8/10 points)
This story uses an omniscient narrator, in which the author stands outside the fictional events, looking in. The author knows the internal thoughts of all the characters; in fact, the author knows everything.

This narrative style dominated 19th century literature and continued well into the 20th. However, it has all but disappeared from commercial fiction today. About 30% of all contemporary fiction uses a first person narrator, while the overwhelming majority of the remainder uses third person limited.

Omniscient narration has many advantages, since it lets the author convey lots of information with minimal words. However, no one reads fiction to learn background information. People read fiction for the human connection with the characters: their sorrows and joys, triumphs and tragedies, loves and losses. Narration chills that connection, which is why it's so much stronger to reveal things through the words and deeds of your characters rather than by telling the readers stuff.

In third person limited, the author chooses one character to provide the point of view. The reader can know what that character sees, hears, smells, and otherwise senses. The reader can know what that character thinks, as well. But the reader has to infer these things about all the other characters through their words and deeds. The idea is that the author places the readers deep inside the head of one character, and then the readers encounter the fictional world through that character in a holistic manner, the same way we encounter the real world. That human connection, done well, will draw the reader into the story and thus into the fictional world.

This is especially effective for a horror story. I think this one would be even more effective if you used third person limited with Dana as the point-of-view character.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(18/20 points)
You generally do a really effective job of showing the various characters' emotional states and reactions to their surroundings. But there are bits here and there that are told rather than shown. For example, in the opening you tell the reader the night was chill but the fire warmed the company rather than showing them being cold and feeling the warmth of the fire.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (20/20 points)
I still love it.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (20/20 points)
Here, you revealed traits through the words and deeds of your characters. This was especially impressive craft, with subtle little gestures showing much. Good work!

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (9/10 points)
Almost perfect...but "prized" should have been "pried."

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 91/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
131
131
Review of The Time has come  Open in new Window.
Review by Author IconMail Icon
Rated: E | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC ContestOpen in new Window..

Item Reviewed: "The Time has comeOpen in new Window.
Author Jon Woodcrest Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
This is well-written with an inspiring message. I liked using the seasons as a metaphor for the stages of life.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (10 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. Generally, an opening should orient the reader in time and space, establish the point of view, and foreshadow the content of the story. You certainly establish the the content, but there really isn't a setting or point of view character.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (10/10 points)
Authors can use first, second, or third point person point of view. Second person is rare, although there are several examples, but today about 30% of all fiction uses a first person narrator and the overwhelming majority of the rest uses a third person narrator. Indeed, almost all of the third person narratives use third person limited, in which the author chooses one character to provide the point of view, and then shows the state of mind of the other characters through their words and deeds. The idea is that this is more immediate and intimate for readers.

For a piece like yours, though, first person or third person (omniscient) are the best choices. You consistently stuck with third person, with no slips.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(10/20 points)
While you've used the seasons as a metaphor, this piece is largely declarative statements: readers mostly don't infer things about what's happening; they are told.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (5/20 points)
In fiction, plot almost always arises from conflict. Characters have goals that conflict, and the goals matter--which are the stakes. Tension arrives from the conflict between goals, and increases by increasing the tension or increasing the conflict. Tension is the engine that propels fiction forward. Much as I liked this piece, I didn't find much tension or conflict in it.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (0/20 points)
Really, there aren't any. I admit this lead doesn't quite fit your piece, but for consistency I still need to assign a score. Note that I've used what I consider to be basic elements of fiction, which I admit is idiosyncratic.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (10/10 points)

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 45/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
132
132
Review of An Autumn Walk  Open in new Window.
Review by Author IconMail Icon
Rated: E | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC ContestOpen in new Window..

Item Reviewed: "Invalid ItemOpen in new Window.
Author mmmpty
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
Speaking as an introvert who lacks self-confidence, I kind of liked Roger, or at least found him sympathetic. The poor guy has such low self-esteem, you have to feel for him!

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (15/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. Some of the tasks for an opening are to orient the reader in space and time, to establish the point of view, and to foreshadow the conflict of the story. You manage to do all these things eventually, but it takes until the end of the seventh paragraph.

Some suggestions. Start where Roger turns his coat collar up and thrusts his hands in his pockets. Maybe have him shiver from the cold. Name him in the first sentence, since that helps to draw readers into his head and hence into the story. Give context to him musing about whether he should get a dog by connecting it to Claire walking a dog--which you do in paragraph eight. Finally, name Claire in the opening, too. Surely Roger knows her name, having obsessed over her.

You DO all these things, you just need to rearrange them so that the essential information is earlier.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (8/10 points)
We're in Roger's point-of-view throughout, but there are some places that feel like an omniscient narrator slips in to tell us stuff. For example, when you talked about his long coat and high-water pants (which make him even more geeky and thus sympathetic), it's as though someone is looking at him from afar and describing him. If, instead, he frowned at his "gaunt, extenuated" appearance and his pants, thinking they make him unattractive (because, of course, that's what he would think), then it would be in his head and hence in his point of view.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(18/20 points)
See above...You're really effective showing Roger's character and Claire's ebullience. It's just the occasional lapse into telling that slips in now and again.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (17/20 points)
So you know I kind of like Roger, but you've got to admit he's pretty creepy, too, right? I mean, he's stalking her, and she has no idea that's what he's doing. Maybe I've read too many gruesome true-crime stories, but I was thinking all the way that "this isn't going to turn out well." Given the way the story ended, I don't think that was your intent. Thus, I'd say maybe you made Roger just a tad too creepy and could back off some. Alternatively, there's a meme called "save the cat" that's known to screenwriters. The idea is to have your character do some gratuitous act of kindness to establish that he's a good guy, i.e., "save the cat." That's as opposed to "kick the dog," which would show he was a bad guy...and Roger is close to that in his fear of Georgie the Corgi (awesome name, BTW).

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (20/20 points)
The characters are finely drawn and credible, atlhough as I noted about Roger may be creepier than you intended. Still, you did a great job of revealing them through their words and deeds.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (10 points)
I didn't find anything to flag in the way of grammar, spelling, or typos. It's not that I read for these things, but I almost always find them (In other people's work, that is. I can never find them in my own). Anyway, kudos for clean copy!

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 88/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! In case it wasn't clear, I really liked this story quite a lot! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
133
133
Review of Out of the Woods  Open in new Window.
Review by Author IconMail Icon
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC ContestOpen in new Window..

Item Reviewed: "Out of the WoodsOpen in new Window.
Author Deano Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
Well, I basically liked *everything* about this story. It's got crime, a wrongly-charged suspect, and a delicious twist at the end. It's almost like you wrote it just for me!

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (20/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. Your opening is masterful. It not only orients the reader in time and space and establishes the point of view, it's full of tension. We know the basic conflict of the story from the very outset.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (10/10 points)
We're in "George's" first person point of view throughout, with no slips. I do wish you'd named him at the start, since that helps to draw readers into his head. However, by the end I wasn't sure that "George" wasn't an ad hoc alias he made up spur of the moment.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(18/20 points)
We learn the action of the story through George's words, deeds, and thoughts. Excellent showing.

I do have one minor suggestion. In more than one place, you write George "heard" or "saw" or otherwise "sensed" something. One example is here:
I heard heavy rustling nearby. This was no squirrel or rabbit but something much bigger. I froze.
This is a subtle form of telling. It's almost always more intimate and immediate for the readers if you directly describe what he heard. Since this is a first person narrative, readers will infer he heard it. If you want to emphasize he heard it, you can have him react in some way, as you do here.

That little step of inference by the readers helps to draw them into George's head and reinforces point of view.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (15/20 points)
As I was reading, I loved the plot. On retrospect, writing this review, I think I see some flaws. For example, George worries about leaving a trail in the mud. He even says he's afraid of "recapture." But recapture by whom? From the ending, it can't be the people who shot him, and he was plainly unaware of the other crime. So, instead of misdirection, this is a flaw in the narrative. I also wonder how he'll find his way back to where he buried the booty, since he was clearly lost at the start. So, while I loved the twist, on retrospect there are some minor flaws.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (18/20 points)
George was a great character, and well-portrayed. The two police, however, were pretty stereotyped and unprofessional. I liked the "Frank Lloyd Wrong" moniker, which I thought clever, but you could have used that even if they had behaved in a more realistic fashion.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (10/10 points)
This is clean copy. I found nothing to quibble over.

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 93/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
134
134
Review of Walk In The Woods  Open in new Window.
Review by Author IconMail Icon
Rated: 18+ | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC ContestOpen in new Window..

Item Reviewed: "Walk In The WoodsOpen in new Window.
Author Seabreeze Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
I loved the mystery the story presents.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (18/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. Your opening does a good job on the essentials: it orients the reader in time and space, it establishes the point of view, and it states the basic mystery that drives the plot.

The only suggestion I have is that naming your point-of-view character helps to draw readers into his head and hence into your fictional world.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (7/10 points)
First person, in Jerry's head. No slips here--at least not until the final paragraph, where the author intrudes to explain the story.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(15/20 points)
Again, up until the last paragraph you did an awesome job of revealing the fictional world through Jerry's thoughts, words, and deeds. I would have liked the story much better, however, if the final two paragraphs had shown us what was happening as opposed to telling use (see above).

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (18/20 points)
This plot could have been chilling. We've got a mystery, and the resolution lines up with our most basic hopes and fears. It really is a twist ending, but the power is dissipated because the author intrudes to tell us rather than show us.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (20/20 points)
Jerry's a great character, and well drawn.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (8/10 points)
I found a few minor typos--"drain" for "drained," for example. Nothing major.

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 86/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
135
135
Review of A Place Of Refuge  Open in new Window.
Review by Author IconMail Icon
Rated: 18+ | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC ContestOpen in new Window..

Item Reviewed: "A Place Of RefugeOpen in new Window.
Author Christopher Roy Denton Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
A story of resilience and a mother's love. There's really nothing to DISlike about this.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (20/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. This opening is almost a master class in how to craft an opening paragraph. It hits on all cylinders. You establish the point of view character, you orient the reader in time and space, you establish the main conflict of the story, and it's full of tension. Awesome writing here.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (10/10 points)
Third person limited in Naomi's head. No slips.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(20/20 points)
The entire story, including the necessary background, is revealed through the characters words and deeds and through Naomi's thoughts. More skillful craft at work.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (20/20 points)
A miniature three act play. I couldn't ask for a better example. In addition, Naomi's goals are clear, the stakes are high, and the obstacles nearly overwhelming. Her moral dilemma is also clear.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (20/20 points)
Both Naomi and India are great characters. The two men are credible villains.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (10/10 points)
I was pretty deep into the story, so I may have missed something, but I don't think so.

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 100/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! This is a really awesome piece of writing. Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
136
136
Review by Author IconMail Icon
Rated: E | (4.0)
*Smile* Hi. My name is Max. I'm writing as one of the official judges for the "Short Shots: Official WDC ContestOpen in new Window..

Item Reviewed: "A Backup to the BackupOpen in new Window.
Author Jeffhans Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
Please remember, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

Ordinarily, I avoid "grading" stories, but, as a judge, I'm required to rank order what I consider the top ten stories. For consistency in my rankings, I've used a point system based on a few basic elements of successful short stories. To repeat, though, these are just one person's opinion. Writing fiction is an art as well as a craft, and each artist is different.

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
An anonymous email exchange leads to a life-changing opportunity. Who hasn't had that fantasy? I love the premise for this story!

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening paragraph. (12/20 points)
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence. Your opening establishes your point of view character, but otherwise it's pretty indefinite. Where is he having these conversations and exchanges, for example? Who is the "someone" in the first sentence? Ideally, the opening establishes the here-and-now of ongoing events in the story instead of abstractly telling us background.

                                                             
*FlagB*Point of view. (10/10 points)
This is all your first person narrator telling us what happened. There are no slip-ups, although it's all narration--more on this below.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective showing as opposed to telling.(8/20 points)
I love this plot. This would be an almost perfect story for an epistolary approach--in this case, where the story is shown through an exchange of emails. The original Dracula used this approach, as did Fried Green Tomatoes. In both cases, large swaths of the story are told through various sources such as news articles, letters, or, in the case of Dracula, transcripts of wax cylinder recordings. By putting the actual words the narrator exchanges with the 1ST2MARS correspondent, readers would see the here-and-now reality of their emails. you would be showing how their conversation evolved as opposed to telling us, and showing is almost always more immediate and intimate than telling. I think this would be a dynamite story if it were shown.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot. (20/20 points)
I loved the plot. It's ingenious and original.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters. (15/20 points)
We really only meet one character, and he's pretty distant. We don't get much about him, or his situation, or his emotions. Showing the story, as opposed to telling it, would help to make him a living, breathing soul. (In fact, re-reading, I'm not even certain of the narrator's gender...)

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical proficiency. (8/10 points)
Other than a few minor comma errors, I found nothing to complain about.

                                                             
*BalloonGo* Total points. 73/100

                                                             
That's it! Remember, good or bad, these are just one person's opinion. Writing a story--any story--is challenging creative work. I commend you for your success and urge you to continue! Thank you for sharing your creativity.

Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
137
137
Review by Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Cross Timbers Groups  Open in new Window.
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
Review Spot Review


Item Reviewed: "Return of the Prince IntroductionOpen in new Window.
Author Rei Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
I liked the genuine affection the warriors showed for each other.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence.

Your opening is your best opportunity to draw readers into your fictional world, to induce a dream-like state in which your words guide their imaginations. The readers become the author's active partners in imagining the fictional world, in a state of suspended disbelief. In crafting the opening of any story, it's the author's primary task to launch this fictional dream.

On the plus side, you started in the middle of action, named your protagonists, and oriented the readers in space and time. The opening also grounded the action that follows.

However, the opening--along with the entire story--uses an omniscient narrator. I'll comment more on this in a moment, but here the omniscient narrator stands *outside* the story, looking in. This makes it challenging for the readers to imagine themselves inside the story and inside your fictional world. Thus, I think the use of either a first person or third person limited point of view would enhance launching the fictional dream.

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
This chapter uses an omniscient narrator, in which the author stands outside the fictional events, looking in. The author knows the internal thoughts of all the characters; in fact, the author knows everything.

This narrative style dominated 19th century literature and continued well into the 20th. However, it has all but disappeared from commercial fiction today. About 30% of all contemporary fiction uses a first person narrator, while the overwhelming majority of the remainder uses third person limited.

Omniscient narration has many advantages, since it lets the author convey lots of information with minimal words. However, no one reads fiction to learn background information. People read fiction for the human connection with the characters: their sorrows and joys, triumphs and tragedies, loves and losses. Narration chills that connection, which is why it's so much stronger to reveal things through the words and deeds of your characters rather than by telling the readers stuff.

In third person limited, for each scene the author chooses one character to provide the point of view. The reader can know what that character sees, hears, smells, and otherwise senses. The reader can know what that character thinks, as well. But the reader has to infer these things about all the other characters through their words and deeds. The idea is that the author places the readers deep inside the head of one character, and then the readers encounter the fictional world through that character in a holistic manner, the same way we encounter the real world. That human connection, done well, will draw the reader into the story and thus into the fictional world.

A novel can--and usually does--have many point-of-view characters, but there should be only one for each scene.

I've flagged a couple of places in the line-by-line comments below to show you where the omniscient narrator hops from being inside one character's head to another. My main suggestion for this story is to pick one of the characters to provide the point of view, and then show the story from that perspective.

                                                             
*FlagB*Referencing
Your request indicated this was fan fiction. Alas, I'm not familiar with the Legend of Zelda, so I didn't catch most--or any--of the references. I mention this mostly to point out my own weakness as a reviewer. It's not really a problem with the story, since the audience for fan fiction surely consists of other fans who will understand the entire context. It does, however, mean that as a reviewer I can't fully comment on referencing, or even relationships between the characters since I'm reading this de novo.

                                                             
*FlagB*Scene/Setting
A little sparse, but then see above: that's probably more of my own limitations.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
Even within my limited perspective, the affection between the characters was clear and moving.

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar
*Exclaim* Adverbs.*Exclaim* You don't overuse adverbs, but they show up enough to be worth a comment. You know what Stephen King says about adverbs . I think he is correct. Adverbs are often a shorthand in which the author falls into "telling" rather than "showing." I try to use zero adverbs, since otherwise I'd sprinkle them all over the place like fairy dust. *Rolleyes* I've marked one or more places in the line-by-line comments below where I think you might consider a more precise verb or a touch more description rather than an adverb.

Most of this story uses the "fictional past," where the narrator is relating events as though they happened in the past. However, there are a couple of instances where it slips to "fictional present," where events are happening in the present. Either is fine and each has its own advantages, but you need to be consistent and pick one or the other. In the line-by-line remarks, I've flagged a couple of places where this happens.

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

As I noted above, I think this would be stronger if you used third person limited. Other than that, I think this is a fine story that will likely resonate with other Zelda fans. Keep writing!

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut*He watches as it takes its place in the adversary’s forehead,*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: tense changes from fictional past to fictional present. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Vio noticed that he'd changed almost immediately. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: changes back to fictional past. Notice here, we are inside Vio's head. *Exclaim*

*Cut*'He sounds like Zelda... But why?' Green thought. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Here, we are inside Green's head, hearing his thoughts. *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my {x-link:http://maxgriffin.net/LongMusings.shtml}


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
138
138
Review by Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Cross Timbers Groups  Open in new Window.
Rated: 18+ | (4.0)
Need a review? Visit
Review Spot Glyph


*Smile* Hi. Max here. Thanks for asking me to read your chapter. I enjoyed reading and wanted to share some thoughts with.

Item Reviewed: "Yawara (Chapter 8)Open in new Window.
Author Torin M. Rutledge Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
There's much to love here, but I think the POV character Mike is the most compelling thing in the chapter. He's clearly somewhat OCD, with his neat room and his obsession with exercise. He's got a troubled history, feels he's got a psychic connection with his dead brother, and that his grandmother has a "sixth sense." Then there's whole mystery of his brother's death and the conflict with the Massis. He's a nuanced character with troubled relationships. Between his girlfriend--who he's only spoken to twice--his parents, his dead brother, and the Massis, his life is chaos. Paired with OCD, that promises an explosion.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence.

Your opening is your best opportunity to draw readers into your fictional world, to induce a dream-like state in which your words guide their imaginations. The readers become the author's active partners in imagining the fictional world, in a state of suspended disbelief. In crafting the opening of any story, it's the author's primary task to launch this fictional dream.

On the positive side, your opening names your POV character, orients the readers in time and space, and begins to establish his compulsive character. In the line-by-line remarks below, I made some suggestions to tweak this, but overall it does a good job.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot
There are lots of plot threads revealed here. Mike's overpowering need for order conflicts with almost everything else in his life. Obstacles abound, and the stakes escalate with the beating at the end of the chapter. Great job launching the plot!

                                                             
*FlagB*Hook
YOu could just end the chapter with Mike's shouted thread to kill all of them and you'd have an outstanding hook. Since the final sentence after that got cut off, I can't tell if you improved on that or not.

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
Third person limited, in Mike's head.

There are some bubbles, though. There are several places where the story stops and the narrator intrudes to tell the readers stuff. I've tried to mark these in the line-by-line remarks below. The idea is to enmesh the readers in the here-and-now of your fictional world and keep them there. Narrated bits pull the readers out of the here-and-now, so you should avoid or at least minimize them.

                                                             
*FlagB*Referencing
Clearly we are in Australia, but the exact era is not entirely clear. I don't recall cell phones, for example.

                                                             
*FlagB*Scene/Setting
Sufficient for staging. In the case of Mike's room you mentioned his compulsion for neatness, so *describing* the room would show that--especially if it contrasted with the rest of the house.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
Mike's the star, and he's compelling. I'm unclear about his age, though. I'm guessing less than 20, maybe even less than 18.

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar
*Exclaim* Comma Splices.*Exclaim*
A comma splice occurs when you have two complete sentences joined by a comma where a period or semicolon should be used. I've marked one or more of these in the line-by-line comments below.

*Exclaim* Adverbs.*Exclaim* You don't overuse adverbs, but they show up enough to be worth a comment. You know what Stephen King says about adverbs . I think he is correct. Adverbs are often a shorthand in which the author falls into "telling" rather than "showing." I try to use zero adverbs, since otherwise I'd sprinkle them all over the place like fairy dust. *Rolleyes* I've marked one or more places in the line-by-line comments below where I think you might consider a more precise verb or a touch more description rather than an adverb.

*Exclaim* "It's" vs "Its."*Exclaim* "It's" is the contraction for "it is." "Its" without an apostrophe is the possessive form of "it."

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

Most of this story uses close third person limited. We're in Mike's head and we learn his thoughts as he reacts to his environment and those around him. There are a few places where the narrative slips to either omniscient--"author intrusions" in my remarks below--or even to "info-dumps"--also see below. Mike is a compelling character. He's clearly grieving the loss of his brother, which makes him sympathetic, too. The closer the readers are to him, the more they will engage with your fictional world and the story.

I'd say this is about 90% there in terms third person limited and keeping the readers in Mike's head. As you read the line-by-line remarks below, it will probably look like I've found a lot places to whine about, but these are relatively minor in terms of the "fix" needed, and not as numerous as they might first appear.

It's true I've spent a lot of time on the line-by-line remarks, but that's because I think this is a compelling chapter with a great character, Mike. This is good enough to deserve careful attention to make it the excellent work that Mike and the story clearly merit. So please take my comments in the spirit they are offered: this is good work already, but some tweaks will make it better.

Thanks for sharing, and by all means do keep writing. It takes real talent to bring a character like Mike to life!

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut*Mike had just returned home from an exhausting three-hour session at the gym, was just walking through the door when his mother, cigarette in hand, told him that he'd missed a couple of phone calls while he was out "wrecking himself".*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Several comments here. First, instead of starting in the past--"had just returned home"--start in the here-and-now by showing Mike walking through the door. Second, instead of telling us his session in the gym was exhausting, show it by describing, for example, aching muscles. Third, instead of telling us what his mother told him, put the actual words in her mouth--have her speak. *Exclaim*

*Cut*So Ashley had rang him this time? He'd spoken to her on the phone a total of two times since asking her out on Sunday, had been a little nervous at first, but they'd found plenty to talk about - physics, philosophy, astronomy. It had been four days since the party at Craig's.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Good use of close third person limited here--we're in his head, hearing his thoughts. You might have him let a smile bend his lips for a bit of subjectivity, but it works as-is. *Exclaim*

*Cut*'The second call was from your grandmother,' Gwen continued.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Does he think of his mother as "Gwen?" If no, it should just be "she continued." Also, you used double quotes above for dialogue and single quotes here. Double would be the US standard, but whichever you use, be consistent. *Exclaim*

*Cut*He heard his mother sigh, saw her light another smoke - and she thought his excessive training was unhealthy? - then he removed his sweat-soaked shirt and retreated to his bedroom.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Phrases like "he heard" and "he saw" are a subtle form of telling us what he sensed. Once you've established Mike as the POV character, arguably everything on the page is something he sensed, hence you don't need to tell the reader he did so. Further, it's almost always more intimate and immediate for your readers to describe directly what he saw and heard. To emphasize he heard/saw it, you can always have him react in some way. Here, for example, he might resist rolling his eyes while thinking "and she thought his training was unhealthy..." *Exclaim*

*Cut*His room was his sanctuary, the place where his few treasured possessions were kept and where he felt most at peace. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: telling. I like the descripton that follows, but it kind of needs tweaked so it feels more like it's Mike settling in to the room rather than the author intruding to describe it. *Exclaim*

*Cut*On the bedside table were two photos of his brother: one a black-and-white portrait he and Ben had gotten Gwen for mother's day long ago - she still had her copy of Mike's portrait in her own room - the other showed two young boys, Ben and Mike, standing together on Mike's first day of high school. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Later you say that he keeps his room neat. As a way of showing that--instead of telling it--you could have him move the picture a fraction of an inch back to its proper place. That also has him interacting with the picture, which helps to make this in his head instead of the narrator telling us stuff. Similarly, in the next sentence, he might run a loving finger over the rocking chair and/or the guitar. Be careful about revealing too much, though--restrict yourself to things he might actually think and do as he enters the room. His actions will show it's his refuge. *Exclaim*

*Cut*He mostly kept the guitar because of it's sentimental and monetary value.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: author intrudes to state a fact. Also, it should be "its." *Exclaim*

*Cut*After Mike changed his shirt, he chucked a Metallica CD - "Ride the Lightning" - into his CD-player and sat down to stretch. It was very important when exercising as vigorously as Mike did that he stretch both before and after training, and the way Mike trained, each stretching session could last forty minutes or more.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Where did he sit? I'm guessing the floor? Also, the sentence about the importance and duration of the stretching is the author intruding to state facts. *Exclaim*

*Cut*he did not remember losing his temper and bad-mouthing the Massis toward the end of the night, which was unfortunate,*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: If he didn't remember it, then this is the author intruding to tell readers something--along with the fact that it was "unfortunate." *Exclaim*

*Cut*A little over half-an-hour later the album he was listening to (stretching to) finished and he ended his session, left the room, strode stiffly out to the lounge-room and dialed Ashley's number. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Avoid parenthetic comments. If you must, use an em-dash to set off the comment. Also, you need a comma after "finished," since this is a compound sentence. The second half is also a compound predicate, so I'd recommend a period after "finished" and starting a new sentence with "He ended..." Otherwise, the sentence feels like a run-on. *Exclaim*

*Cut*After that he called out to his mother, told her he was headed to his Grandma's and set off at a spirited run.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Tells us what he's saying. As above, put the actual words in his mouth. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Ruby Stone, Mike's Grandma on his father's side, *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Author intrudes to tell the reader stuff. Editors tend to hate this kind of thing and have a name for it: the "info-dump." Remember, you've got an entire novel to reveal this kind of information. You should figure out what readers need to know to understand the here-and-now of evolving events and devise ways to reveal that information--and only that information--through the words and deeds of your characters. That way, you keep the fictional dream running in the readers' minds. *Exclaim*

*Cut*There were beautiful red roses and violets brimming with vitality, well-watered bougainvillea and of course, the ancient gum-tree out the back - a relic that would outlive them all. He approached the front door and rang the bell twice.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Story restarts here. To internalize the description of the flowers, you might lead with him inhaling their heady scent. *Exclaim*

*Cut*His grandmother lived on her own.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Author states a fact. Can you find a way to internalize this tidbit? Perhaps above, for example, when he looks at the tidy flower beds, he could think that, despite being sick and living alone, she still kept the place up. *Exclaim*

*Cut*"It's Ashley,' he said, and went inside, seating himself at her dining-room table. Just like that, he felt safe to talk around his Grandma, though he certainly was not going to tell her of his hearing Ben's voice - it would only worry her - but he sensed that everything else was okay to speak of here.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Another good use of deep third person limited. Note that the facts that appear here are nuanced in a way that they are clearly internal to Mikey's head as opposed to the narrator, standing outside events, telling us stuff. *Exclaim*

*Cut*They sipped from the tea and Mike told her firstly how much he missed Ben*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Again, you are narrating the dialogue rather than showing it. *Exclaim*

*Cut*He told her about the Massis, then, how their father had died trying to save Ben - and how his surviving sons blamed him and his family, wanted them gone from Lark Hill. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: ...more narrated dialogue... *Exclaim*

*Cut*Mike looked toward where she was pointing he saw*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Mike "looked and saw" is like "Mike heard" above... *Exclaim*

*Cut*an elegant vase combining greens and blues and yellows in intricately leaf-shaped patterns. It was only a small thing, perhaps forty centimetres long and ten wide. It looked expensive, though. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Good description, but what made it "look expensive?" *Exclaim*

*Cut*Mike carefully took the urn down from it's place on the aged shelf,*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: typo: its not it's. *Exclaim*

*Cut*left her house and went home, carrying the urn cautiously.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This is one of those weak verb/adverb combinations I mentioned above. Here, perhaps he "cradles" the urn, which would imply caution. *Exclaim*

*Cut*For the people of Lark Hill the day dawned like any other Saturday in town*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Story stops while the author tells the reader stuff... *Exclaim*

*Cut*He awoke from a dreamless sleep to shouting*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: After some narration about how he spent his Saturday, the here-and-now of the story restarts here. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Mike sighed, emerged from his room, saw his father seated on the lounge with his head in his hands.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Mike...saw...just describe his father directly. *Exclaim*

*Cut*'It's fine, Mikey,' his Dad replied, maybe he thought Mike would believe him?*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Comma splice; need a period or semicolon after "replied." *Exclaim*

*Cut*The animosity growing between his parents was tough for him to witness, *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: author intrusion *Exclaim*

*Cut*Jake had mentioned the other day *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: who is Jake? *Exclaim*

*Cut*But after a little consideration he decided to visit his best friend - whatever th*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Something missing here...it seems it got cut off. *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my essay  Open in new Window. on short stories.



*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
139
139
Review by Author IconMail Icon
Rated: 18+ | (4.0)
Review Spot Review


Item Reviewed: "Ken Reaches For The HeightsOpen in new Window.
Author Christopher Roy Denton Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
This is another strong story. Ken is a character with clear goals and obstacles. The tension increases nicely. The opening is awesome. The plot reaches climax, resolves, and then wraps up without any extraneous words. Not much I can say to improve this.

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
Third person limited, in Ken's head. There are maybe one or two places where I'd think about being a little more deeply in Ken's head--especially in the climactic scene on the ledge. But certainly there are no slips.

                                                             
*FlagB*Scene/Setting
Good job overall, although I almost always whine about wanting more. For example, sounds of the creaky fire escape, or the sensation of wind whipping his hair might add some sensory details to the climax. Be careful to use them to increase tension, though.

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar

*Exclaim* Adverbs.*Exclaim* You don't overuse adverbs, but they show up enough to be worth a comment. You know what Stephen King says about adverbs . I think he is correct. Adverbs are often a shorthand in which the author falls into "telling" rather than "showing." I try to use zero adverbs, since otherwise I'd sprinkle them all over the place like fairy dust. *Rolleyes* I've marked one or more places in the line-by-line comments below where I think you might consider a more precise verb or a touch more description rather than an adverb.

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

I did find a couple of places where "Ken saw" or "Ken found." These are subtle forms of telling. See the line-by-line commments below.

OVerall, this is a great story for the the contest. I found a couple of really minor things that might--or might not!--improve the flow, but it's well-written as is. Good luck!!!

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut*Ken gazed up at the Ferris wheel and shuddered. Its multicolored flashing lights provided a cheerful contrast to the night sky, but in his mind's eye he saw rotor blades crashing through green foliage. Ever since that fateful crash landing in the jungle, he hadn't been the same. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Excellent opening paragraph. *Exclaim*

*Cut*This close, he could see her eyes were squeezed shut and her face twisted in fear. Avoiding looking down, he leaned over the handrail and reached out. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Phrases like "This close, he could see" are a subtle form of telling. "This close" is shorthand for telling us he's now close--as opposed to showing it. In addition, arguably, since we are in Ken's head, everything on the page is something he's seen or otherwise sensed. It's generally more intimate and immediate for readers if you just report directly what he sees, and they will infer he sensed it. That little step of inference helps to solidify point of view. If you want to emphasize he saw it, you can always have him react in some way. Since the situation is more tense, I'd also consider using shorter sentences, or even fragments. The second sentence above, for example, has two pieces of information. I'd consider something like: "Don't look down. He leaned over the handrail and reached out." "Don't look down" puts us inside his head, deciding to not look down, and is more urgent that "avoiding looking down," which disconnects the action and the actor. *Exclaim*

*Cut*He clambered over the handrail and put his feet on the same ledge she’d used to reach the drainpipe, keeping a tight grip on the handrail beside him. Now that he was closer, he placed a hand gently on her shoulder.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: "Handrail" used twice in close proximity. "Placed..gently" is a weak verb/adverb combination. Is there a stronger verb available? Maybe "nudged," for example. *Exclaim*

*Cut*As he became accustomed to the light, he saw that they were inside a lady’s bedroom, with pink walls, a lace throw over the bed, and the scent of floral perfume.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Another instance of "He saw..." Also, for clarity, I'd say "the dim light." *Exclaim*

*Cut*He rapidly checked her airway and pulse. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Another weak verb/adverb combination. *Exclaim*

*Cut*The lady sat up and scanned the room. “Sophie?”*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Great name for the child. *Exclaim*


                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my {x-link:http://maxgriffin.net/LongMusings.shtml}


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
140
140
Review by Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Cross Timbers Groups  Open in new Window.
Rated: 18+ | (4.0)
Review Spot Review


Item Reviewed: "Gold Prospecting For DummiesOpen in new Window.
Author Christopher Roy Denton Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
This is a very punny story. I liked it a lot.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening
Excellent opening that performed all the essential tasks effortlessly.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot
we knew from outset this would end in disaster, but you kept the tension stringing ever tighter.

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
Third person limimted, IN Daphne's airhead.

                                                             
*FlagB*Scene/Setting
Sufficient for staging. Since it's a TV set, I'm not sure what more you could do.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
No problem understanding Daphne's, goals, the stakes, or the obstacles. Ditto for all the other characters.

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

Really, this is a great story. It's amusing, one that we see play out over and over again on inane TV shows, and it's got credible characters. Nice job.

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut* Now she'd reached the wrong side of forty, *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: I think you meant, "Now THAT she'd..." *Exclaim*

*Cut*“Welcome to Beijing Today,” said the show’s pig-faced presenter.

Miss Dian Deng Pao tilted toward the camera*Cut*
*Exclaim*My Comment: Is Dian Deng Pao the show's presenter? If so, I'd use her name in the prior sentence and then her descriptor and title in the following sentence. I think that would be clearer. *Exclaim*

*Cut*famous single,Party Till Everybody Pukes?”*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Missing space. Snot sounds like Joe Walsh. *Exclaim*

*Cut*forEntertainment Mexico. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: missing space *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my {x-link:http://maxgriffin.net/LongMusings.shtml}


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
141
141
Review of A "Worthy Goal"  Open in new Window.
Review by Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Cross Timbers Groups  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (4.0)
Need a review? Visit
Review Spot Glyph


*Smile* Hi. Max here. Thanks for asking me to read and critique your story. I enjoyed it and wanted to share some thoughts with you.

Item Reviewed: "A "Worthy Goal"Open in new Window.
Author Jeremiah_Johnson Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

I see that you are new to Writing.Com, so I'd also like to add my personal welcome to the site. This is a great place to learn and grow as an author, as well as to make new friends. There's something here for everyone, so it's worth the effort to explore the site. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to write to me. It looks like you're off to a great start, though!

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
David Sidaris is one of my favorite humorists. Some of his best pieces involve first-person narratives about amusing incidents from his childhood that, without fail, provide insights into modern-day living. This story reminded me of Sidaris, so thank you for that. If I had to choose the one part of the story I liked best, I think it's the "shortcut." It is, of course, the most amusing part of the story, and well-told. But it's also serves as a wonderful metaphor for the two brothers finding their path in life which, ultimately, is what this story is about.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence.

Your opening is your best opportunity to draw readers into your fictional world, to induce a dream-like state in which your words guide their imaginations. The readers become the author's active partners in imagining the fictional world, in a state of suspended disbelief. In crafting the opening of any story, it's the author's primary task to launch this fictional dream.

There are some basic bits of information that help to orient your readers. These include at least some of the usual suspects: who, what, when, where, why, and how. For example, we don't learn your brother's name until half-way through the story, and we never learn your name. In the second paragraph, we learn they are in the mountains, but I only know they are in the Appalachian mountains from reading your bio-block on WDC. The when, where, and why questions are more or less covered.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot
On the hunt for a basketball hoop, two brothers take a shortcut.

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
First person.

About 30% of all published fiction today uses a first person narrator, while the overwhelming majority of the remainder uses third person limited. First person is a natural for a reminiscence like this, but it turns out first person is harder to write than third person limited.

First person is hard despite the fact that we tell first person stories all the time. At the end of the day, often over dinner, our spouse or other family member will ask how our day went, and we will relate an amusing, interesting, or at least diverting incident. There's often an element of acting involved in the telling, whether it's an eye-roll or droll tone. When we write in first person, it's easy to imagine exactly this setting, with our readers sitting right next to us listening to our account.

There are at least two problems with this. First, the above scenario involves telling the story. The maxim for the written word is that showing is stronger than telling. Secondly, there are non-verbal cues that happen when you tell a story out loud to someone, and those non-verbal cues are absent from the written page unless you put them there.

The reason first person is hard to write is because written first person narratives are necessarily different from the spoken kind we use all the time in everyday life.

Let me give an example of what this might mean for your story. You might start with the two brothers doing something. You might even start with them already on their journey, possibly with nettles prickling the narrator's skin. He could complain to his brother about the shortcut. They could argue, the way brothers sometimes do, about whether the trip to get the basketball rim was worth it, how much better it would be than what they have now. You'd reveal the answers to the basic informational questions through the words and deeds of your characters. That's showing as opposed to telling, which is how you do it in this story.

The reason for showing is because it's both more intimate and immediate for your readers. They experience your fictional world holistically, through the senses, words, and deeds of your narrator. They imagine that they are inside the narrator, experiencing his world through him. This vastly increases the power of your story.

Showing will almost invariably take more words than telling, but it's worth the effort.

                                                             
*FlagB*Referencing
You give little details like "pre-WalMart" that help establish the era. We know the setting is rural and mountainous, too, again from details you reveal. Good job.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
I'd love to hear these characters speak, to get to know them better.

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar
I saw one typo, otherwise this is perfect. I have to say that, while I don't read for grammar, I almost always find something to complain about. Not here! Good job!

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

My main comment for this story is that you find ways to show the essential elements rather than tell them. The cross-country journey should be shown, perhaps in little episodes. One with nettles, one at about the fourth hill, one with the bull--how did they get out that, by the way? Did panic jitter down your spine? Show how that felt! All of this was to get the hoop, which turned out to be not what they were expecting. But it turned out that this journey, which was part of their love of basketball, had life-long consequences. So the end of the journey in the story, like their lives, had unexpected consequences. My take-away for this story is that things don't always work out like the way you expect, but they always work out, one way or another. The point is the journey, not the destination. Maybe I'm reading too much of myself into your story, but that just points to the power of your metaphor. In a truly good story, readers will always bring their own perspective. Your's is a truly good story. Thank you for sharing.

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             

*Cut*someone had leveled out a spot near my friennd David's house*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: typo *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*



Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my essay  Open in new Window. on short stories.



*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
142
142
Review of Apartment 15  Open in new Window.
Review by Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Cross Timbers Groups  Open in new Window.
Rated: ASR | (4.0)
Need a review? Visit
Review Spot Glyph


*Smile* Hi. Max here. Thank you for asking me to read your story. I enjoyed it and wanted to share some thoughts with you.

Item Reviewed: "Apartment 15Open in new Window.
Author Christopher Robin Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
There is much to love here, but for me the best part is the twist at the end. I love stories with a Twilight Zone feel, and this one certainly delivered!

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence.

Your opening is your best opportunity to draw readers into your fictional world. In your opening, you establish the point of view and name your point-of-view character. You also tell us some fundamental characteristics of your character.

I especially like your very first sentence which mirrors the opening sentence of "The Tell-Tale Heart." Poe was one of the first masters of the short story, and he would likely have loved this one.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot
I don't want to give away the plot, but I will say that it's the strongest part of a strong story.

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
I think you can tell I liked your story, but I do have some comments and suggestions in this section.

This story uses a first person narrator. About thirty percent of published fiction today uses this narrative style. It's comes naturally, since we use this almost every day in our lives. At the end of the day, perhaps over dinner, a family member might ask, "How was your day?" In response, we tell an amusing or at least interesting event that happened. It's tempting for an author to have this intimate setting in mind while writing a first person narrative. Indeed, that temptation is one of the things that makes writing first person stories so challenging.

Here's the problem with that scenario: it's all about telling your story. When you do this with family and friends, there's almost always an element of acting as well--your tone of voice, the expression on your face, other body language helps to convey the events. But on the written page, it becomes telling. The most difficult lesson for fiction authors to learn and to consistently do is showing not telling.

"Showing" means being in the moment, in the here-and-now of evolving events. "Showing" means revealing the information in the story through the words and deeds of your characters and--in the case of your point-of-view character--through thoughts and sensations. "Showing" is more intimate and immediate for your readers. Showing draws them into your fictional world, and hence into your story. Modern readers don't want to read about your fictional world. They want to experience it holistically, the way they experience the real world.

Now back to your story. The action in the story starts when Josh get's the phone call from apartment fifteen. Everything prior to that point is background and it's all narrated, i.e., told instead of shown. Editors call this the info-dump, and it's an almost certain route to the "do-not-read" pile for submissions.

Please understand that as recently as the 70s, you could find *many* stories that include this kind of narrated background. I'm sure you can even find it in currently published stories by well-established authors. But well-established authors don't have to worry about being dumped onto the slush pile: they get read and accepted because they have a record of sales. Beginning authors, on the other hand, need to adhere to the more modern expectations of editors and readers.

All of this is a long preamble to my main suggestion for this story: develop an introductory scene of some kind that conveys the information in the opening through the words and deeds of the characters. You could include Josh's thoughts and sensations as well, but not those of other characters since Josh can only infer those from their words and deeds.

You know best how to do this, but here's one possible solution. First, you could establish he's a student working on his dissertation just by having him working on it. while monitoring the switchboard. He could take a call and answer it "Elysium Retirement Community, apartments for assisted living," or some other marketing spiel. That shows where he works. He could wonder--or be annoyed--that he got a call at 10PM about rentals. Perhaps the facility has a nurse who spends the night. He and the nurse could have a conversation. She might even "pray" for one of the people at the facility, or merely say "God bless her." That gives an opportunity for Josh to think something like, "how can an intelligent person like Zedekiah" need superstitions like religion. He could even be superior about how his scientific training frees him from needing religion. These are but a couple of ways to show the necessary information in the opening.

Note, too, that readers only need to know enough to understand what's happening in the here-and-now of the story. As the author, you need to know all the details, but don't necessarily need to spell them all out in the story. That's another tricky problelm: what to put in and what to leave out. But it's not as tricky as showing the information as opposed to telling it.

Notice that once Josh takes the call, almost all the action of the story is shown. The dialogue is believable and well done. Tension builds nicely to the reveal at the climax. It's the combination of the plot and effecting showing in the here-and-now of the story that makes this so effective. So, it's not like the above means I'm suggesting a huge revision to your story. On the contrary--I'm primarily suggesting a revision to the opening.

                                                             
*FlagB*Scene/Setting
THe setting is sufficient for staging--it's clear throughout where the characters are in relation to each other. I might prefer a touch more setting, but that's a matter of taste. As an example, maybe Josh's desk is cluttered with his laptop, dog-eared copies of his dissertation, and a pizza box. Or maybe the same things are there and you describe them in a way that shows Josh is obsessively neat. Either way adds some color to the setting and reveals a bit about Josh. A touch of description can add to mood, character, and plot. Don't overdo it though--too much description becomes what Elmore Leonard described as the "parts of a story readers skip."

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
Josh is a credible and likable character. We know he's thoughtful, since he's troubled by the cognitive dissonance of his deepest beliefs and his lived experience as related in this story.

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar
I don't read for grammar, but I almost always find things to whine about. Not here. You are clearly an experienced and literate author.

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

The notion of a "guided dream" informs most of my work as an author and reviewer. After the introductory info-dump, the guided dream in this story is compelling. Tension cranks ever tighter as the call comes in and the wait for the paramedics ensues. Then, bang! We're at the climax. Some tweaking to the opening will make this a great story, not just a good one. Thanks for sharing, and do keep on writing!

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut* Uses of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Determine the Three-Dimensional Structure of Large Non-Polymeric Molecules. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Since this is capitals, I infer it is the title of his dissertation? If so, the US standard would be to italicize it. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Not having been blessed with what is often euphemistically referred to as "private resources" (.i.e. rich parents), I needed a job to finance myself while I completed my thesis. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This tidbit about Josh's perseverance is an excellent way to make him sympathetic and put readers on his side. Most editors tend to deprecate parenthetic comments and prefer the m-dash instead. *Exclaim*

*Cut*All was pretty smooth sailing until the early hours of 14th May. It was just after midnight and a call came in; a call I will never forget as long as I live, no matter how hard I try.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This is where the story actually starts. Everything prior to this is narrated background. *Exclaim*

*Cut*I answered.

"Hello, Mrs. Graham. Josh here. How are you tonight?"*Cut*
*Exclaim*My Comment: Assuming the "I answered" is a dialogue tag, this should be
I answered, "Hello, Mrs. Graham...
In any case, it is connected to his speech and should be on the same line as his words. *Exclaim*


*Cut*"My name is Rose Graham and I live in Apartment 15."*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Hmmm...perhaps she should say, "I'm calling from apartment 15." Also, "apartment" should be lower case and "fifteen" should be written out. *Exclaim*

*Cut*"I don't feel very well."*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: It might be useful to have some sensory information here on the tone and timbre of her voice. Is it thin and reedy, for example? *Exclaim*

*Cut*and I could focus on my thesis again.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: In the US a doctoral student writes a dissertation and a masters student writes a thesis. Degrees are somewhat different in the UK. *Exclaim*

*Cut*"No, it's Amanda Ryan. I'm a paramedic with MCS. Is that Josh?"*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: I think she'd say, "is this Josh..." *Exclaim*

*Cut*I detected a strain in the paramedic's voice.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This is a subtle form of telling. Since we're in Josh's head, arguably everything on the page is something he's sensed or knows. Usually, it's more intimate and immediate for the readers if you directly describe what he sensed. They will infer he "detected" it since he's providing the point-of-view. Indeed, that little step of inference strengthens the connection with Josh. If you want to emphasize he "detected" it, you can have him react in some way. *Exclaim*

*Cut*"What do you mean? The usual way; Mrs. Graham rang me on the hotline, the same one you're using now. She told me felt unwell so I called you guys in."*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This would be a good place to give an emotional reaction from Josh. Is he annoyed, or is a trickle of fear jittering down his spine? *Exclaim*

*Cut*"DEAD???!!! You've got to be kidding me! How can she keel over and die that quickly?"*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Again, give us some internal suggestion of his emotional reaction. Also, rather than using all caps, you might him "shout" or "exclaim." *Exclaim*

*Cut*I tried to process this but it just floated there in front of me like a fog. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: missing comma after "this." *Exclaim*

*Cut*"Me neither. We've covered the body. That's as much as we can do. You need to inform the family. We'll file our report."*Cut**Exclaim* This doesn't quite ring true. Since there is evidence of a call from the apartment, they would think *someone* was in the apartment and made the call. Why did that person leave? Theft comes immediately to mind, so they'd probably call the police to investigate. You could have them just say, "The cops will have to investigate" and leave it at that. That leaves open who issues the death certificate, calls the medical examiner, transports the body, etc., none of which matters to the story which is essentially over.

One of the things Poe taught us about short stories was that they should end as soon after the climax as possible. From that perspective, this story goes on just a bit too long after this point. If you could cut it by half or more from this point forward, I think it would be more effective.
*Exclaim*


                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my essay  Open in new Window. on short stories.



*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
143
143
Review by Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Cross Timbers Groups  Open in new Window.
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
Need a review? Visit
Review Spot Glyph


*Smile* Hi. Max here. Thanks for asking me to read your chapters. I enjoyed them and wanted to share some thoughts with you.

Item Reviewed: "Darkside Outpost Three - chapters 1-5Open in new Window.
Author Dragonbane Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
I love science fiction and, in particular, the sub-genre known as "space opera." You've constructed a fully realized fictional universe, populated with interesting humans and given them intriguing aliens with whom they interact. You give us just enough of the underlying technology to understand what's going on in the story and resist the temptation to provide a detailed info-dump. The plot starts with a new commanding officer and the changed dynamics that implies, along with the mystery of his assignment. Thus, these chapters give a good launch to your novel and reveal just enough of your extensive and detailed world-building to pique the readers' interest. Nice job!

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice

I'm going to start with comments on point of view, because this is where I'm going to make my main suggestions.

In the line-by-line remarks below, you'll find several places where I remark that the point-of-view has "hopped" from Mat to Anna or back. This often happens when the author choose to use an omniscient narrator, a style that dominated fiction well into the mid-to-late twentieth century. However, this style has all but disappeared from commercial fiction today. About 30% of all contemporary fiction uses a first person narrator, while the overwhelming majority of the remainder uses third person limited.

Omniscient narration has many advantages, since it lets the author convey lots of information with minimal words. However, no one reads fiction to learn background information. People read fiction for the human connection with the characters: their sorrows and joys, triumphs and tragedies, loves and losses. Narration chills that connection, which is why it's so much stronger to reveal things through the words and deeds of your characters rather than by telling the readers stuff.

In third person limited, for each scene the author chooses one character to provide the point of view. The reader can know what that character sees, hears, smells, and otherwise senses. The reader can know what that character thinks, as well. But the reader has to infer these things about all the other characters through their words and deeds. The idea is that the author places the readers deep inside the head of one character, and then the readers encounter the fictional world through that character in a holistic manner, the same way we encounter the real world. That human connection, done well, will draw the reader into the story and thus into the fictional world.

A novel can--and usually does--have many point-of-view characters, but there should be only one for each scene. In many novels, you will find a fixed point-of-view in each chapter. This is especially useful in opening chapters, where readers are not only learning about your fictional universe, but are also meeting your characters for the first time. Putting the readers in that character's head and keeping them there for an entire chapter helps to solidify both the point of view, the fictional world, and the characterization.

Note that this is in striking contrast to a movie, where the camera provides the point of view for the audience. In addition, in a movie we have actors, mise en scene, the score, the sound effects, and so on to create the story. In a novel, all we have are words on page. But those words, done with skill and heart, can create an even more intimate and immediate experience readers since it all happens in their heads by stimulating their imaginations.

So, my biggest suggestion for these chapters is to decide on one character to provide the point of view for each chapter. I'm tempted to say that would be Mat for Chapter One and Anna for Chapter two, but it could be Mat for both or Anna for both. This will involve some re-working of events, since Mat (or Anna) can't experience what happens outside of his presence. But sticking with one point of view will greatly increase the immediacy and intimacy of the chapters, and therefore also increase the readers' emotional engagement.

Back to those line-by-line comments: I've used them to mark some--but not all--of the places where the POV hops from one character to another. If you choose to take my advice on point of view, those are the places to watch for.

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence.

Your opening is your best opportunity to draw readers into your fictional world, to induce a dream-like state in which your words guide their imaginations. The readers become the author's active partners in imagining the fictional world, in a state of suspended disbelief. In crafting the opening of any story, it's the author's primary task to launch this fictional dream.

Your opening starts with Mat admiring himself in a mirror. That's good, in that it starts with him doing something. You also name him, describe him (since he's looking in the mirror, the description stays inside his head), and, through his uniform, we learn a bit of his history. You also orient the reader in space and time. THese are all positives.

However, having Mat admire himself in the mirror makes him seem like a bit of a narcissist, something that doesn't come through later. As an alternative, you might have him fuss over the details of his uniform to be sure they are perfect. That would give him an air of being OCD, giving inordinate attention to details. That would be consistent with his later actions.

Overall, though, I found your opening to be effective.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot
As noted above, we have a couple of plot points already: the dynamic between Anna and Mat and the mystery of his assignment. You do a great job presenting both through the words and deeds of your characters and avoid the infamous info-dump. It's an interesting plot, set in an original and interesting universe.

                                                             
*FlagB*Referencing
Good work here, too. You reveal just enough about the world, its technology, and its politics so we can understand what's happening in the here-and-now of ongoing events.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
I like both characters. Mat appears to be smart and effective. I like Anna even more. She's equally smart, a good officer who thinks things through, who wants the mission to succeed, and wants to excel for the sake of excellence as opposed to merely advancing her career. The interplay between the Sharimdara was just enough to sew seeds of distrust without being explicit.

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar
*Exclaim* Run-on sentences.*Exclaim*
I only marked a couple of these, but these chapters are filled with run-on sentences. This web page might be helpful in finding and fixing these:
http://writing.umn.edu/sws/quickhelp/grammar/runon...

*Exclaim* Commas.*Exclaim*
I thought I saw some comma errors. I'm terrible with commas, so I won't try to point them out. Instead, here's a great reference:
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/grammar/g_c...
I've read it, and they're still a mystery to me. I hope it helps!

*Exclaim* Adverbs.*Exclaim* You don't overuse adverbs, but they show up enough to be worth a comment. You know what Stephen King says about adverbs . I think he is correct. Adverbs are often a shorthand in which the author falls into "telling" rather than "showing." I try to use zero adverbs, since otherwise I'd sprinkle them all over the place like fairy dust. *Rolleyes* I've marked one or more places in the line-by-line comments below where I think you might consider a more precise verb or a touch more description rather than an adverb.

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

The ideas behind the fictional dream provide the basis for my comments above on point of view. The changes needed to achieve third person limited point of view are relatively small, but will pay big dividends. These chapters have many strengths, and there is much to love here. Thanks for sharing, and do keep writing!

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut*“He’s nearly a week overdue I was beginning to think the pirates had got him,” Lieutenant Commander Anna Lopez said.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This seems to launch a new scene, in a new location, with new characters. *Exclaim*

b}*Cut*“His escort has picked him up then when are they due to arrive?” *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This is one of many places where you've joined two sentences together with no intervening punctuation or conjunction. For example, this might be better as *Exclaim*

*Cut*she paused, hesitant to continue.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Since we learn what's in Anna's head--that she's reluctant to continue--this establishes her point-of-view. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Mat studied the station as the shuttle pilot handed over control to the docking computers. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Here we hop back into Mat's head. *Exclaim*

*Cut*To look at there was nothing out of the ordinary about Outpost Three it was like all the other orbital station's earth had built a large grey cylinder with struts protruding out along its surface from which attached round tubes that circled the cylinder.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Run-on sentence. Also, no apostrophe in stations (plural). *Exclaim*

*Cut*Mat woke to the persistent call of his commvid groaning*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: We seem to have jumped from Mat preparing to disembark to Mat waking up in his new quarters. At a minimum, you need a visual cue, for example extra vertical space or even three centered stars, to let the readers know about the shift. *Exclaim*

*Cut*“She must have glimpsed me pulling my pants on not the best start but can’t be helped,” Mat mused reflectively.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: He actually said this out loud, so she can hear him? Or did you mean that the thought it? If the latter, it should be in italics with no "thought tags" like "he mused." *Exclaim*

*Cut*“Aye sir,” Anna replied and turned sharply as Mat turned of his commvid. “Well, that’s two things I know about him already he has a good body, and he is decisive more so than Greg Stevens anyhow.”*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Since the vid is off, the point-of-view has necessarily hopped here into Anna's head. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Mat took the turbo lift he didn’t generally like turbo lifts they tended to make him queasy *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: and now we've hopped back to Mat's head. *Exclaim*

*Cut*“Signal from the Sharimda ship audio only sir,” Anna said she wondered why audio only *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Hops to Anna's head since we know what she's wondering. *Exclaim*

*Cut*fell on death ears*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: deaf ears *Exclaim*

*Cut*Mat studied the cruiser, as it made its final approach there was some minor damage to the hull nothing serious. Thankfully all of the delta-wing returned*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: hops back to Mat's head. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Anna started to object and thought better of it.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: "thought better of it" is in Anna's head. *Exclaim*

*Cut* “Here it comes I just knew the captain should have been here.” Anna thought,*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: The editorial standard for quoting thoughts is generally to use italics only with no quotation marks and to not use "thought tags" like "she thought." *Exclaim*

*Cut*“Yes, where is the captain; his absence borders on the insulting?” Sianna asked coldly*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This is one of several places where you use an adverb to modify words like "said" or "asked" following a bit of dialogue. Here, what nonverbal cues might Sianna give that let Anna infer her speech was "cold?" Did her eyes flash, perhaps? Or maybe she "sneered" or "snarled." Or you could have Anna react with a chill running down her spine. All of these are more visceral that using an adverb to pep up a weak verb. *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my essay  Open in new Window. on short stories.



*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
144
144
Review of The Sacrifice  Open in new Window.
Review by Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Cross Timbers Groups  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (4.0)
Review Spot Review


Item Reviewed: "The SacrificeOpen in new Window.
Author AME Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
The theme of this story is powerful, all the more so due to the excellent characterizations. This is quite sad, so it would be wrong to say I "enjoyed" it, but I certainly am glad I read it and appreciate your sharing.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
Effective characters have goals and face obstacles. The goals matter; those are the stakes. These are the basic building blocks of plot.

In this story, the protagonist is battling a debilitating disease, depression. Her loving companion, Ezra, is there for her, helping her during a long and painful healing process. Recovery is Rianne's goal, and we know from the opening paragraph that the stakes are life-and-death. The pervasive character of the disease is the obstacle. Ezra, too, has Rianne's recovery as his goal.

So, this story is powerful in part because the goals, obstacles, and stakes are so clear and so important.

But it's the heart-breaking twist to this story that ultimately gives power to the plot.

So characters combine with plot and theme to give an outstanding story.

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
First person, in Rianne's head. I found one little bump, otherwise this was perfect.

I did notice a few instances where you wrote Rianne "felt" or "heard" or otherwise "sensed" something. Most of the time you described the sensation directly, which is generally better. Saying she "felt" something is a subtle form of telling. When you describe it directly, readers readily infer she 'felt' it since you've done a good job putting us in her head. That little step of inference helps to draw them into your story. If you want to emphasize she "sensed" it, you can have her react--as you do in several places in the story.

                                                             
*FlagB*Scene/Setting
This was sufficient for staging--I could tell where the characters were in relation to each other. I understand that depression can deaden the senses, but add a few more might increase the intimacy of the story. If Rianne caught a whiff of Ezra's scent, for example, that might be a nice touch.

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar

*Exclaim* Adverbs.*Exclaim* You don't overuse adverbs, but they show up enough to be worth a comment. You know what Stephen King says about adverbs . I think he is correct. Adverbs are often a shorthand in which the author falls into "telling" rather than "showing." I try to use zero adverbs, since otherwise I'd sprinkle them all over the place like fairy dust. *Rolleyes* I've marked one or more places in the line-by-line comments below where I think you might consider a more precise verb or a touch more description rather than an adverb.

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

This was a really good story and showed a mature grasp of character, tension, story-telling, and plot. It's an admirable mix of story and theme. Thank you for sharing, and do keep writing!

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut*It was past midnight. The city looked so peaceful, in contrast to the day scene, but my mind was anything but. My feet sought the edge of the roof, and stopped. My heart was pounding, my mind racing. One more step, just one, and all of this would be over. No more pain. No more misery. No more emptiness. No more opening my eyes in the morning and immediately starting to count down the hours till the day was over.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment:
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence.

Your opening is your best opportunity to draw readers into your fictional world, to induce a dream-like state in which your words guide their imaginations. The readers become the author's active partners in imagining the fictional world, in a state of suspended disbelief. In crafting the opening of any story, it's the author's primary task to launch this fictional dream.

There are many solid points about this opening. You certainly start in the middle of action. You orient the readers in time and space. You foreshadow both the action and the plot of the story. You establish point of view. These are all positives, and things authors often forget, so good job!

I do have a couple of minor tweaks, though. For example, I wish there were a way to name your point-of-view character in the opening paragraph. She does get named in the third paragraph, however, and it's certainly better to start with action than a disembodied voice speaking.

However, you *do* start with a statement of fact. If you did something as simple as put the sentence, "My feet sought the edge..." first, that would accomplish a couple of things. First, it would establish the voice of the first-person narrator. That makes the second sentence arguably (and intuitively) in her head rather than a faceless narrator, standing outside the story, stating a fact. It also adds immediate tension: she's teetering on the edge. Then we learn it's midnight. That's a great hook to draw the readers into your story.

Overall, though, this is an effective opening. You show the narrator's emotional state, her despair, and you do so using subjective language which helps to draw readers into her head and hence into the story. *Exclaim*


*Cut*Why am I like this? My brain screamed silently. Why do I feel this way? What am I supposed to do? How am I supposed to deal with all this? What is wrong with me?*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: It's correct to use italics when quoting internal thoughts. However, editors almost always deprecate "thought tags," like "my brain screamed silently." *Exclaim*

*Cut*“Rianne,” A low voice behind me made my body tense up but I stayed rooted to the spot.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Another picky comment. Readers will have already "heard" the voice in their heads, so it's usually better to lead with the tone and timbre, as in, "A low voice spoke from behind me," and then put in what the voice said. You are correct, however, to keep the reaction *after* the words, keeping a linear time flow. *Exclaim*

*Cut*my large, wild eyes*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: She can't see her eyes, so this is a small POV violation. *Exclaim*

*Cut*taking in his dishevelled appearance*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: nice foreshadowing--even here, he's showing signs of depression. Note the typo, though: only one "l" in disheveled. *Exclaim*

*Cut*“Okay,” I replied softly before hanging up.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This is one of those weak verb/adverb combinations I mentioned. Perhaps she "murmured" or "whispered," or even "muttered." *Exclaim*

b}*Cut*“Hey,” he greeted me softly, his hand stroking my hair tenderly. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: See above for "softly." "Tenderly" is a little speedbump that's not needed. He wouldn't stroke her hair "roughly," right? In that case, he'd "tousle" it. If you want a more precise verb, "caress" might do. *Exclaim*

*Cut*I stared blankly at him,*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: another adverb..."gaped" might be better... *Exclaim*

*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Nice, evocative language here. Notice, you didn't say "I felt waves of peace," which would be telling. Instead, you described the sensation directly, which is more intimate and immediate for readers. *Exclaim*

*Cut*how he did in his own exams that was held on that same day.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: typo: that were held... *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my {x-link:http://maxgriffin.net/LongMusings.shtml}


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
145
145
Review of Samantha's Pet  Open in new Window.
Review by Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Cross Timbers Groups  Open in new Window.
Rated: 18+ | (4.0)
Review Spot Review


Item Reviewed: "Samantha's PetOpen in new Window.
Author Christopher Roy Denton Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
OMG, I loved this story. Your description of Lilith perfectly matched Bebe Neuwirth's character in Frasier and Cheers. If "Bob" were named "Frasier" or "Niles," it would have been even funnier for me. (FWIW, In one episode, Frasier has an obsession with a pricey lawyer named Samantha.)

Besides my probably delusional connections to a TV sitcom, I loved this story for the foreshadowing, the descriptions, and the twist at the end. I do wonder how Bob felt about his fate, though?

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening
Your opening is perfection.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot
Soda shot out my nose when I read the ending. I mean, I saw it coming, but it was a thing of beauty.

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
Third person limited in Bob's dorky head.

                                                             
*FlagB*Referencing
NYC, modern era. BTW, how did she find a place to PARK?

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
We learn about Bob's desire to please and his submissive nature through his thoughts about Samantha. Lilith is perfect, although I may have been influenced by visions of the character Lilith from Frasier.

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar
Perfect

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
Okay, I'm really glad you sent this to me, but surely you weren't looking for ways to improve it? It's perfect as it is.

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut*She didn't need a dog; she had Bob to roll over and fetch.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Haha...I bet this is foreshadowing, too. I was kidding here, but this turns out to be prescient. *Exclaim*

*Cut*"Lilith." *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: If she has alabaster white skin and a biting, sarcastic wit, I've met her before on Frasier. *Exclaim*

*Cut*As they shook hands, hers felt strangely cold.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: see above. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Soon, the buildings grew smaller, and it became clear they were headed out of town.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: At least he's not hanging his head out the window with his hair fluttering the breeze and his tongue hanging out. Wait...maybe he SHOULD be? *Exclaim*

*Cut*As the gray city buildings segued into green fields and trees, Lilith turned to Bob with a predatory smirk. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: hmmm....predatory... *Exclaim*

*Cut*"Yes. Someone to feed you, ensure you get enough exercise, and punish you when you've been a naughty Bob."*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Okay, now it's pretty clear where this is headed... *Exclaim*

*Cut*meanytime."*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: missing space. OKay, so there is ONE thing to improve. *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my {x-link:http://maxgriffin.net/LongMusings.shtml}


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
146
146
Review by Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Cross Timbers Groups  Open in new Window.
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
** Image ID #2159387 Unavailable **

*Smile* Hi. My name is Max and, for my personal welcome to Writing.Com, I'm sending you some comments on your story. I found it on the Noticing Newbies  Open in new Window. page, enjoyed reading it, and wanted to share some thoughts with you.

Item Reviewed: "Grendel on the MoorOpen in new Window.
Author kmack Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
Please remember these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
Since you are new to Writing.Com, I'd like to add my personal welcome to the site. This is a great place to post your work, to learn and grow as an author, and to make new friends. You'll find a wide range of opportunities here. The site can be a little overpowering at first, so if you have any questions, please don't hesitate to drop me a note. If I don't know the answer, I'll try to find out.

Okay, then. Here we go with my comments!

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
I check the "newbie" list daily, looking for things to read. I'm so glad I found your story. The Beowulf references drew me to this piece, and you kept them running throughout. I loved the premise, and felt more than a bit sorry for Grendon.

I liked your prose, too. It's fully of active verbs, vivid descriptions, and the characters each speak with distinctive voices. We learn about your fictional world largely through the words and deeds of your characters, so there is good showing--as opposed to telling--here, too.

You've also injected humor which more than once brought a smile to my face.

Finally, you made the monster human. You make him sympathetic by having him do a good deed in saving the "chicken" in the initial scene. In terms of tropes, this is sometimes called "saving the cat." Even though his confusion has led to deaths, he's still a tragic figure at the end.

Finally, the little twist at the end, with the finger hovering over the mobile phone, leaves the reader wondering what will happen next. That finger gives lie to Calpol's belief that "no one would believe" the farmer.

Overall, this was a satisfying read. Thank you for sharing!

                                                             
*FlagB*Some things you might think about.

Point of View.
This story uses an omniscient narrator, showing knowledge of the inner thoughts of both Calpol and Grendon. The opening scene feels like the narrator is standing outside the story, looking in. This would be perfect for a screenplay, where the camera is the eye of the audience. But in most stories, a *character* serves as the point-of-view for the audience. I think if you settled on a single point-of-view and stuck with it, you'd have a more immediate and intimate story.

The text wasn't consistent in referencing Grendon--sometimes he's a "he" and sometimes he's an "it." With a consistent point-of-view, you'd have to settle on one or the other.

There were a few typos in the story. I don't read for these, but I noted a couple in the line-by-line remarks below.

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
I picked your story because I liked it and thought that your writing showed talent. This review is mostly just first impressions. If you'd like more in-depth comments, please don't hesitate to visit
Review Spot Glyph


Thank you for sharing your work, and please keep on writing!!!

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Cut*Calpol shifted uneasily in his trenchcoat, running his finger inside the clammy collar. That was the problem with England.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This is an excellent way to launch this scene. You name the point-of-view character. He's reacting to his environment, and you use subjective descriptions like "clammy," which help to put the readers inside his head. That helps engage the readers. Now, when you describe things, it will be as though Calpol is sensing them. Since you've put them "inside his head," that makes it more immediate and intimate for the readers. Good job! *Exclaim*

*Cut* It's been all we can do to keep it of the press.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: typo: missing word. *Exclaim*

*Cut*"Your not going to hit me with a forget ray*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Typo: should be "you're..." *Exclaim* or somethin', are you ?" asked the farmer.

*Cut*TheFarmer watched him go, then looked uncertainly at his cell phone, finger hovering over the 'send' button.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Awesome ending! *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my {item:1847273.


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
147
147
Review of The Bum  Open in new Window.
Review by Author IconMail Icon
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
Review Spot Review


Item Reviewed: "The BumOpen in new Window.
Author Karl Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
This is a really fine story. It's well plotted, with a fine air of mystery and good tension. The ending provides a twist that is both satisfying and adds to the mystery. Nice job!!!

                                                             
*FlagB*Opening
Openings are critical in any work of fiction. Some editors and agents will decide whether or not to read your submission based only on your first sentence.

Your opening is your best opportunity to draw readers into your fictional world, to induce a dream-like state in which your words guide their imaginations. The readers become the author's active partners in imagining the fictional world, in a state of suspended disbelief. In crafting the opening of any story, it's the author's primary task to launch this fictional dream.

Your opening introduces the two characters, establishes the fundamentals of who they are and their relationship, and foreshadows the plot. Overall, it's excellent.

I have only a couple of tweaks to suggest. First, I think it would help to have a hint of the setting. We don't need more than a word or two to establish what kind of neighborhood we're in, but it would be helpful. Second, I think if you could find a way to reveal the name of your narrator in the opening paragraph, this would achieve a couple of goals. First, it would help to draw readers into his head and solidify the fictional dream. Second, in terms of the theme, having a named narrator and a nameless "bum" reinforces the differences between them.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot
Good job increasing the tension!

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
First person, with one possible minor wobble. See the line-by-line remarks below.

                                                             
*FlagB*Scene/Setting
I could use a touch more, especially at the very beginning.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
The narrator remarks at one that there is not much difference between him and the bum. Certainly, that's true for anyone but I wonder if there is something in his history that led him to this insight?

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar
*Exclaim* Comma Splices.*Exclaim*
A comma splice occurs when you have two complete sentences joined by a comma where a period or semicolon should be used. I've marked one or more of these in the line-by-line comments below.

*Exclaim* Adverbs.*Exclaim* You don't overuse adverbs, but they show up enough to be worth a comment. You know what Stephen King says about adverbs . I think he is correct. Adverbs are often a shorthand in which the author falls into "telling" rather than "showing." I try to use zero adverbs, since otherwise I'd sprinkle them all over the place like fairy dust. *Rolleyes* I've marked one or more places in the line-by-line comments below where I think you might consider a more precise verb or a touch more description rather than an adverb.

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

THis is a really powerful little story. I enjoyed reading it and seeing the parts come together at the end. Thank you for sharing. I see this is the only story in your WDC portfolio, so I'd like to encourage you to write and post more stories. You have a real talent.

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut*Even when you looked right at him and tried to see him, he was barely there, barely visible. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Nice interleaving of theme with description. *Exclaim*

*Cut*I saw him wandering the neighborhood daily. He would look at me out of the corner of his eyes, pretending not to look.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: A couple of minor points here. First, phrases like "I saw" are a subtle form of telling. We know we're in the narrator's head, so arguably everything on the page is something he's seen, heard, or otherwise sensed. It's almost always more intimate and immediate for readers to describe directly what he "saw." Since we're already in his head, readers will infer he "saw" it. Indeed, that little step of inference helps to solidify point of view and the fictional dream. If you want t emphasize he "saw" him, you can have him react in some way.

The second point is even more arcane. Your narrator can't know the bum was "pretending" not to look, he can only infer that. This is kind of borderline, since "pretending" is also a conclusion the narrator could have reached and is now reporting to the readers. It's potentially a tiny bobble in the first person narrative, however, since it also could be read as jumping into the bum's head. If you added, "like he was pretending..." it clarifies that it's a judgement at the expense of being less direct. I'm of mixed mind on which is better in this case, but I wanted to at least raise the issue. *Exclaim*


*Cut*There was an empty lot at the edge of the neighborhood where he carefully sorted the contents of his sack into different piles.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: "Carefully" is one of those adverbs I mentioned above, in this case telling instead of showing. Why does the narrator infer that he's being careful as opposed to random? What about the piles or how he constructs them lead to this inference? You actually answer these questions when you describe the piles later, so I think you eliminate the adverb altogether and have smoother prose. *Exclaim*

*Cut*It made me wonder how he had gotten to where he was in life, what mistakes had he made, what had caused him to be where he was?*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Comma splice *Exclaim*

*Cut*It quickly moved closer and intensified until it was right on top of the neighborhood. I changed direction and quickly headed back towards my apartment. My dog was scared by the storm and pulled on the leash.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: More adverbs--"quickly." Also beware repeating words and phrases, since runs the risk of making your prose seem monotone. *Exclaim*



                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my {x-link:http://maxgriffin.net/LongMusings.shtml}


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
148
148
Review by Author IconMail Icon
Rated: E | (4.0)
** Image ID #1992612 Unavailable **


Hi! My name is Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author Icon, and I'm here to review your entry in the "Invalid ItemOpen in new Window.

Item Reviewed: "Memories of StephanieOpen in new Window.
Author Pernell Rogers Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
I love stories with a twist, and this one delivered!

                                                             
*FlagB*Third Person Limited Point of View
(28 points out of 30)
You did a great job establishing Chris's point-of-view and sticking with it. There was just one little wobble toward the end where the author intruded with some background information, but otherwise this was perfect. Good job!

                                                             
*FlagB*First Paragraph
(18 points out of 20)
Your opening puts the readers in Chris's head, it starts in the middle of action, and it orients the readers in space and time. I suggested a couple of tweaks in the line-by-line remarks below to improve the orientation and to foreshadow the plot, but in any case this was a great opening paragraph.

                                                             
*FlagB*Creativity and Originality
(15 points out of 15)
Nice job here, too, using his guilt, intoxication, and grief to establish his horror at the ending.

                                                             
*FlagB*Effective Showing (not telling)
(14 points out of 15)
Good work here too, again with the exception of the paragraph at the end.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot and Pacing
(8 points out of 10)
I loved the plot! But I think you could add to the tension if Chris "thinks" he sees his wife a couple of times earlier in the story. That way his emotional reaction can escalate from chiding himself for being silly to his delusional state at the ending, thereby increasing the tension.

                                                             
*FlagB*Technical Proficiency (such as grammar, spelling, proof-reading, and following the contest rules)
(9 points out of 10)
I found one minor typo.

                                                             
*FlagB* Total Points
92 points out of 100



                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

This is a great story. It could have been on the Twilight Zone or the old Alfred Hitchcock TV series. Thanks for sharing!!!

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut*Chris walked through the hatch and turned left while the rest of the human cattle turned right.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: I get that the phrase "human cattle" instead of "passengers" reveals something about Chris's character. However, it's also not 100% clear where he's at in this sentence. Inserting "airplane's" in front of "hatch" would immediately establish his location and remove doubt. *Exclaim*

*Cut* this was going to be the last trip he would take with his wife.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: So, of course, I'm wondering, "where is his wife?" Since the only passenger you've mentioned is the woman in the next seat, I wondred if it might be her? It turns out that her location isn't supposed to be a mystery after all, since you tell us a few paragraphs later. Since it's essential to the plot, I'd consider doing so here, as part of orienting the reader. *Exclaim*

*Cut*He watched the little red straw spin around his plastic cup*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: In first class, this would almost certainly be glass, not plastic. *Exclaim*

*Cut*There it was. He saw them loading his wife's coffin *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: I'd more or less figured this out, but I'm wondering why you waited until now to make it explicit? It's actually central to the plot, so I think it would be stronger to have him see this as he settles into his seat. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Good riddens.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: typo: riddance I'm also not sure about doing a flashback here, since it interrupts the here-and-now of events in the story. It might be better if the memory is related to his seat-mate, for example, since that would keep you in the present. *Exclaim*

*Cut*He may try to strangle him in the terminal.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Too many pronouns here--who is going to strangle whom? *Exclaim*

.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This foreshadows the ending, of course. However, we're nearly 2/3 of the way through the story. I think it would be stronger if he thinks he sees his wife as he's boarding the plane and perhaps one other time, to establish his increasingly tenuous hold on reality. *Exclaim*

b}*Cut*The screen turned black before the movie started. To his horror, he saw his wife's reflection on the screen. *Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Repeating words and phrases runs the risk making your prose seem monotone. Here, "screen" repeats. *Exclaim*

*Cut*He was always aware of Stephanie's obsession with him from the beginning of their relationship.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: In this paragraph, the author intrudes to tell the reader stuff. The age difference and his infidelity don't even seem to me to be essential information for the readers to understand what's happening. In any case, narrated background of this type takes readers out of the here-and-now of the story and interrupts the natural flow of events. It would be easy enough to insert this into the flow, bit by bit, earlier in the story if you deem it essential. *Exclaim*

*Cut*It was Stephanie...*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: awesome ending! *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Even though I'm scoring this for a contest, I'm also reviewing in part for my own edification. Thus, as is my usual policy, I have given a rating of "4" to all contest entries. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for our contest. We hope you found it to be fun and a learning experience. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my {x-link:http://maxgriffin.net/LongMusings.shtml}


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
149
149
Review by Author IconMail Icon
Rated: E | (4.0)
Review Spot Review


Item Reviewed: "A Sky Full of StarsOpen in new Window.
Author AME Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
At less than 400 words, this is flash fiction. That's incredibly hard to write with any emotional vigor. It's almost like poetry, where every word counts. You've managed to tell a melancholy story of a woman, the night sky, and her absent love. Why he's absent (death? a break-up?) isn't important. What's important is that she misses him amidst the splendor of the night. So I liked the prose, the emotions, and the way things tied together at the end.

In your post, you said you wanted to know "how good" you are as a writer. For what it's worth and based on these 290 words, I'd say you are quite good. I've read more authors than I can count on WDC. In my real-world career as a professor, I've read even more work, mostly by graduate students. Your story isn't very long, but based on this sample I'd say your writing compares favorably with these advanced students--and you're only sixteen! They have at least six years of writing experience and training beyond yours, so I in fact think this is extraordinary.

Since this is flash fiction, most of my usual comment headers don't fit--they are designed for longer works of fiction. So I'll just pass on to a couple of minor line-by-line remarks. Thanks for sharing, and by all means keep writing. THis shows great promise!!

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut*Night was her favourite time of the day.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: A couple of comments here. First, it would help to draw readers in if they knew "her" name. Knowing the name of the point-of-view character makes her more intimate and immediate to the readers.

Second, this of course tells the readers she enjoys the night as opposed to showing it. Now, this is essentially flash fiction, where economy of words is sometimes more important than conventional craft like "show, don't tell," so that's more an observation than a suggestion for change. *Exclaim*


*Cut*When she made her way past a hectic day of work, when almost everyone was already in bed, when the city was quiet except for the occasional sounds of a vehicle rumbling past or the scuffle of a catfight that broke out in a street somewhere, when the dark sky was decorated with lights from buildings where people like her were enjoying the nightlife.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: This sentence has a nice rhythm to it. The fact that it's a fragment simply adds to its resilience. However, it's got four "whens." This may seem silly, but there's a "rule of three" for these kinds of lists. You find it everywhere, not only in literature but in speeches from orators ranging from Roosevelt to Thatcher. It's kind of engrained in culture and language. So, I'd suggest at a minimum breaking the sentence after the third "when" and then continuing with a new sentence, perhaps also breaking the rhythm of the "whens." *Exclaim*

*Cut*Amidst the peace and quiet of everything, she couldn't help but wonder about him. Is he looking at the same stars that I am? she wondered, with a tinge of melancholy. Would his view be as magnificent as mine?*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: The missing lover adds a nice piquancy to the piece. Perhaps, back in the first sentence, where you tell us she likes nighttime, you might mention that the hope that he is in the shadows animates the night. That would add an element of "showing" to the opening as well as giving some additional symmetry to the piece by starting and ending with her missing her love. *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my {x-link:http://maxgriffin.net/LongMusings.shtml}


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
150
150
Review by Author IconMail Icon
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
Review Spot Review


Chapter: "A Gatored CommunityOpen in new Window.
Author Yesmrbill Author IconMail Icon
Reviewer: Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon

                                                             
As always, these are just one person's opinions. Always remember Only you know what is best for your story. I've read and commented on your work as I would try to read my own. I hope you find something here useful *Smile*, and that you will discard the rest with good cheer. *Heart*

                                                             
*FlagB*What I liked best
This post-apocalyptic novel is about a community that has successfully transitioned to a marshland following sea rise from global warming. The chapter focuses on Ted, who will inherit his father's oyster farm which has apparently ade the family rich by selling cultured pearls. The chapter also suggests a conflict between Ted's fundamentalist culture and the interloper Andalib. All of this shows much promise for a novel that uses a fictional world to address problems of interest to people today.

                                                             
*FlagB*Characters
We primarily meet Ted and Andalib as they meet each other. Ted seems a bit feckless, while Andalib has an air of mystery about her. She's also got two companions who add a sinister air to her mystery and make her presence threatening when contrasted with Ted's cluelessness.

There are a few things missing for me here.

Hitchcock famously said that the audience cares about the characters. The plot, he continued, is there to give the characters something to care about. There's truth to that in fiction as well as cinema.

Characters have goals: something they strive to attain. The goals matter: something bad happens if they don't achieve their goals. Those are the stakes. Finally, there are obstacles to achieving those goals. Tension arises in the conflict between goals, stakes, and obstacles. Authors increase tension by deepening the goals, raising the stakes, or adding obstacles. Tension is the key to momentum in your novel and to keeping the pages turning.

Ted read like an empty vessel with no goals at all. His ex-fiance has just been eaten by a gator his own family recklessly loosed on the community, and he seems completely indifferent to the event--except that he laments, selfishly, that he'll "never stop hearing about it." Oh, and he has a goal of celibacy, even though he just picked up a girl in a bar. In any case, we don't know why that goal matters to him, so the stakes are absent.

You've given us every reason to believe that Andalib has goals, but no real information what they might be. Given her companions' conversation, her stated goal of "getting laid" must be subterfuge.

We're left, then with no goals for the characters. We also have few if any reasons to cheer for them.

To be sure, the framework for this fictional world has a lot going for it and will doubtless figure in the plot. But the readers need to get to know your characters first, and have a reason to cheer for them. Maybe they should be cheering for them to get together, or for Andalib to find God and religion, or for Ted's liberation from the same. I don't know--it's your novel. But that's the point. I don't know. We have a first date, some interesting discussion about the socioeconomics of your fictional community, but nothign to emotionally connect to.

So, my primary suggestion is to give your characters--especially Ted, since he's the primary focus of this chapter--purpose, obstacles, and stakes. We need to know what he wants. The same is true for Andalib, although we have a bit more about her--at least we know she wants something.

                                                             
*FlagB*Plot
So far the plot seems to be boy-meets-girl, but I think your plot is more complex than that. So, see my comments above.

                                                             
*FlagB*Hook
Your chapter ends with a suggestion of conflict to come. I think you need a stronger hook to keep the pages turning. This blog by Pam Zollman has an excellent discussion of hooks, so I'll just point you there.
http://thebookdoctorbd.blogspot.com/2011/09/using-...

                                                             
*FlagB*Style and Voice
This chapter uses an omniscient narrator, in which the author stands outside the fictional events, looking in. The author knows the internal thoughts of all the characters; in fact, the author knows everything. Look at the opening paragraphs, for example, where you begin by giving us the history of the Mackenzie family and a physical description of Ted--this is the narrator, standing outside the story, telling the readers things. Readers today want to learn about your fictional world holistically, the way the learn about the real world. That's why most novels today use third person limited point of view.

This narrative style dominated 19th century literature and continued well into the 20th. However, it has all but disappeared from commercial fiction today. About 30% of all contemporary fiction uses a first person narrator, while the overwhelming majority of the remainder uses third person limited.

Omniscient narration has many advantages, since it lets the author convey lots of information with minimal words. However, no one reads fiction to learn background information. People read fiction for the human connection with the characters: their sorrows and joys, triumphs and tragedies, loves and losses. Narration chills that connection, which is why it's so much stronger to reveal things through the words and deeds of your characters rather than by telling the readers stuff.

In third person limited, for each scene the author chooses one character to provide the point of view. The reader can know what that character sees, hears, smells, and otherwise senses. The reader can know what that character thinks, as well. But the reader has to infer these things about all the other characters through their words and deeds. The idea is that the author places the readers deep inside the head of one character, and then the readers encounter the fictional world through that character in a holistic manner, the same way we encounter the real world. That human connection, done well, will draw the reader into the story and thus into the fictional world.

A novel can--and usually does--have many point-of-view characters, but there should be only one for each scene.

Another suggestion for this chapter is to re-work it so that the entire thing is in Ted's point of view. That might mean cutting some things--like the mini-scenes with Andalib's companions--but the benefit from increased intimacy and immediacy will be worth it. You can always add scenes with those two guys (maybe in chapter 2?) to get the tension that arises from their conversation.

                                                             
*FlagB*Referencing
Nice bits of detail about the life in the community.

                                                             
*FlagB*Scene/Setting
Sufficient for staging, but I could have used a touch more. Be careful to have the scenes descriptions in Ted's head, though. They should be natural things that he might think or feel.

                                                             
*FlagB*Grammar
*Exclaim* Adverbs.*Exclaim* You don't overuse adverbs, but they show up enough to be worth a comment. You know what Stephen King says about adverbs . I think he is correct. Adverbs are often a shorthand in which the author falls into "telling" rather than "showing." I try to use zero adverbs, since otherwise I'd sprinkle them all over the place like fairy dust. *Rolleyes* I've marked one or more places in the line-by-line comments below where I think you might consider a more precise verb or a touch more description rather than an adverb.

                                                             
*FlagB*Just my personal opinion
One way to think of telling a story is that it is a guided dream in which the author leads the readers through the events. In doing this, the author needs to engage the readers as active participants in the story, so that they become the author's partner in imagining the story. Elements of craft that engage the readers and immerse them in the story enhance this fictive dream. On the other hand, authors should avoid things that interrupt the dream and pull readers out of the story.

I like the *story* so far, but I wish I had more reason to like the characters--or to at least find them interesting. I know it's the first chapter, but I think we need a bit more depth of feeling from them. Putting us deeply inside Ted's head in third person limited would go a long way toward doing that.

Do keep writing. As I said, there's much to love here, although I think there are some things that could be tweaked. Clearly, you've constructed a detailed and complex fictional world and populated it with numerous characters. I'm betting, for example, that Ted's father turns out to be one of the more interesting characters in the novel, although he's barely mentioned so far. Thanks for sharing!!!

                                                             
*FlagB*Line-by-line remarks
*Bullet*Your text is in BLUE.
*Bullet*My comments are in GREEN.
*Bullet*If I suggest a re-wording, it's in GRAPE.
                                                             
*Cut*“Corn as high as an elephant’s eye.” Just like the words in that old show tune said.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: From "Oklahoma!," of course. As it happens, I live in Tulsa, not far from Claremore where the musical is set. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Then the creature quickly slid down the embankment*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Here's one of those pesky adverbs I mentioned. Perhaps the creature "slithered" for a more precise verb? Or, if you want a visual, use a metaphor appropriate to the fictional community. *Exclaim*

*Cut*moved rapidly away from Ted.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Here's another: they "sped," which is more efficient and avoids the adverb. *Exclaim*

*Cut*The strong tangy smell of the channel mixed with the aroma of the beer that dark haired Ted was drinking.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: While we're focused on Ted, you're really using an omniscient narrator. For example here, Ted isn't going to be thinking about his dark hair, so that's the omniscient narrator telling the reader stuff. Moreover, you earlier told us he was dark-haired, so this is redundant. *Exclaim*

*Cut*“The alligator’s just a temporary problem.” He said, “It’ll be recaptured soon enough. The woman who got eaten was named Doris Shaffer. She was my ex-fiancee. I'm gonna be hearing about that forever.”*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: I must say that his evident lack of remorse is making him unlikable. I assume that's your intent. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Then whoever orders that oyster, only has to pay what the Amberjack charges for the meal.”*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: I must be missing something. Wouldn't they have to pay for the food regardless? Or is he saying they don't get charged for the pearl, just for the food? But then it's not a "diner's discount," which is how it's described later. *Exclaim*

*Cut*Ted ordered two orders of oysters with seasoned rice in butter sauce and wine.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment:*Exclaim*My Comment: I guess not everyone lives in floating communities since they have butter and wine available… *Exclaim* *Exclaim*

*Cut*The older man, who was in his mid thirties, spoke quietly. “I don’t like the way you’re staring at her Xavier.”*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Note the adverb. Perhaps he "murmured" or "muttered." Also, I'm guessing that Ted can't hear this--another clue this is omniscient narration. *Exclaim*

*Cut*She looked out into the dark, seeing a few stars twinkling in the sky, while an almost full moon shone above the rooftops.*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: Now we're Andalib's head, since we know what she sees. *Exclaim*

*Cut*She had not looked at either he*Cut**Exclaim*My Comment: typo: at him… *Exclaim*

                                                             

I only review things I like, and I really liked this story. I'm a professor by day, and find awarding grades the least satisfying part of my job. *Frown* Since I'm reviewing in part for my own edification, I decided long ago to give a rating of "4" to everything I review, thus avoiding the necessity of "grading" things on WDC. So please don't assign any weight to my "grade" -- but know that I selected this story for review because I liked it and thought I could learn from studying it. *Smile*


Again, these are just one person's opinions. Only you know what is best for your story! The surest path to success is to keep writing and to be true to your muse!

Thanks again for sharing this item. Keep on writing!


Max Griffin 🏳️‍🌈 Author IconMail Icon
http://MaxGriffin.net/
http://MaxGriffin.net/blog/
Check out my {x-link:http://maxgriffin.net/LongMusings.shtml}


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
461 Reviews *Magnify*
Page of 19 25 per page   < >
Printed from https://p15.writing.com/main/profile/reviews/mathguy/sort_by/r.review_creation_time DESC/page/6