*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
Creative fun in
the palm of your hand.
Printed from http://p15.writing.com/main/authors/action/reviewers
The Writing.Com members below are accepting review requests and ready to review your item! Peruse the list, check out members' review styles and request a review from anyone who seems like a good fit for your item.
purplesunday's Portfolio!
Preferred Author
Choconut
(minimum 1,500 GPs)
I tend to write in depth reviews, discussing all aspects I feel need addressing. I am always positive and encouraging, but I'm also honest. If I feel something needs looking at, I will mention it.
Registered Author
Once In a Red Moon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I give accurate and detailed reviews. I emphasize the points that I liked and point out the aspects that could stand improving. But if I can't find something nice to say, I make it a point to say nothing at all.
Preferred Author
edgework
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Unsentimental. I focus on the kinds of craft issues that will keep a writer from being taken seriously and prevent them from fully expressing their vision. For more information, see "Writing Hurts: Review Forum
Registered Author
Somik Bandopadhyay
(minimum 5,000 GPs)
I wish to give the review to short-stories or in poetry. I try to extract the facts of the particular literature. I want to give a review in a positive mind.
jimjam3442's Portfolio!
Registered Author
J.M. Arlen
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I read as if I'm watching a movie, and try to focus on the story as much as I can. If something you wrote stands out in my mind, I'll tell you.
Senior Moderator
Jace
(minimum 2,500 GPs)
I tend to cut a wide swath through a review, covering all not only a general overview and characterizations, but also technical areas such as grammar and punctuation. I consider my style to be more in-depth with a good deal of time expenditure on each review. Hence, I tend to give out fewer reviews because of a busy personal schedule.
soledad_moon's Portfolio!
Preferred Author
Elisa the Snowman Stik
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
In a single word, thorough. I will turn your piece upside down, shake the change out of its pockets and look at even the most minute details. I can be technical but will do so when emphasizing a larger point about the piece as a whole.
Preferred Author
BIG BAD WOLF Is Merry!
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I'll give a quick summary of your item. Afterwards, I'll talk about your characters, any Spelling or Grammar issues, and perhaps suggest some things, like adding the item to a Genre that it would fit into.
twowolves's Portfolio!
Registered Author
Canis Lupis
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Honest and frank...period.
cat.voleur's Portfolio!
Preferred Author
Cat Voleur
(minimum 1,500 GPs)
Versatile: I'm good at reviewing different types of writing in different ways. Honest: While I do my best to be honest and encouraging in reviews, I don't omit things. If I tell you I like something about a piece, you can trust that I'm not just saying it. All-Inclusive/Well-Rounded: I look for the good and bad in writing. I'll give you an overall opinion as well as the highlights and what needs worked on.
Registered Author
Maimat
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Somewhat simple, I focus on positive remarks and some constructive criticism.
Registered Author
Donkey Hoetay
(minimum 2,000 GPs)
So we all admit that not all stories are created equally. I'll attempt then, to review on a curve, based on an arbitrary two tier system. If the story really impresses me in its uniqueness and is publication worthy, it will make my tier 1 review and I will specifically say so. If the submission is average or below and not publication material it will make my tier 2 review but I will not overtly say this. Both kinds of reviews will still garner supportive analysis and constructive criticism where necessary.
Preferred Author
Azrael Tseng
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Still discovering it. I prefer to review only works that touch me in some way, or from writers I know want honest feedback to help improve their work, and I'm actually in a position to give it.
sailor661's Portfolio!
Registered Author
Sailor661
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Easy critical and I'll tell you whether I like it or not.
Preferred Author
🎼 RRodgersWrites 🎶
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
very detailed reviews
Registered Author
H. E. Dunkle
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
When I read through something, I tend to focus on grammatical errors, character development (if applicable), pacing, and how satisfied I am with the ending. If you want me to focus on a certain aspect, let me know in your request.
Registered Author
DANIEL RAY DANIELLIAN SCHOOL
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Daniellian
dewaholic's Portfolio!
Registered Author
*Jenny*
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I look to be entertained, informed, and connected in some way. It may be wrong but if the first few lines or paragraphs don't hook me in some way, I will leave without even reading the rest. Also, I will notify you if I run into errors.
Registered Author
SleepySerpent
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I aim to give a bizarre little meld of creative and technical pointers. My behavior always goes for being thoughtful and polite. If someone says: "I'm brutally honest/I say it like I see it," I think they're misinterpreting what it means to critique something. At the same time, I want to try and see if I might give advice that can make a writer stronger and not just sugarcoat things. We're writers, we make mistakes! But there's just a teenie weenie bit of difference between constructive criticism and having an inferiority complex! Bare in mind also that I am learning and if you think something I address is incorrect, by all means, please bring it up! We're here to learn from each other!
the-inkblotch's Portfolio!
Registered Author
Aaron Zhu
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Each review will address the following points-- The PROSE: Was it easy to follow? The PLOT: Is it logical? Coherent? The CHARACTERS: Do they have a voice of their own? How do they develop? Grammar and technicalities are not given much emphasis on -- download a software to find those things for you, not me.
Printed from http://p15.writing.com/main/authors/action/reviewers