*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
Printed from https://p15.writing.com/main/profile/reviews/deaconmission/sort_by/r.review_creation_time DESC/page/2
Review Requests: OFF
85 Public Reviews Given
85 Total Reviews Given
Review Style
If you're a newbie (you've been a member 30 days or less) then just send me an email. I post plenty of free reviews on this site. No need to spend your precious few reward points on me. However, the piece you want me to review still needs to fit within my guidelines. I'll always point out what I liked about a piece, as well as what I feel needs to be improved upon. I'll hit on both technical issues, as well as story content and overall feel of a piece. I like to be as encouraging as possible, without detracting from what I feel needs to be improved.
I'm good at...
I am, by my own admission, a bit of a grammar nerd. I also understand that, in creative writing, sometimes the rules have to be bent. I'm good at giving credit where credit is due. If you've put in effort, I'll notice. I don't expect a piece to be perfect, but if you don't care about your work, you can't expect someone else to care.
Favorite Genres
Fantasy, Sci-Fi, Religious, Action/Adventure
I will not review...
Anything with overly offensive content. Use your own bit of judgment here. If you wouldn't expect me to let my kids read it, I don't want to read it, either.
Public Reviews
Previous ... 1 -2- ... Next
26
26
Review of The  
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: 13+ | (1.0)
Okay I have to ask. What?

And by that, I really am curious. What was the reason behind a one letter piece of writing?

I'm particularly curious about the length of the title in relation to the piece, itself. So, when you get a chance, I'd truly like to know. Thanks.

God bless you!
27
27
Review of The Dive  
Review by R. Michael Wood
In affiliation with WdC SuperPower Reviewers Group  
Rated: 13+ | (3.5)
Reviewed on behalf of the WDC Power Reviewers


First impression:
I like the idea of having a story told entirely in dialogue format. It's different. That, added with the fact that the majority of the story is done via radio communication, it really gives the feeling that the reader is just reading a transcript of their comm logs.

Rating issue:
Please pay attention here.
You have this item rated as E. That's not an appropriate rating for this piece. I'll get into why later, but think of an E rating on here as a G rating for movies. If it's not appropriate for a four year old child of very strict parents, it's not an E rating.

Technical issues:

I did find quite a few technical problems. I'll outline them here. A lot of the time when I get to this portion it can start to feel like I'm picking on people. I promise that's not my goal. I want to help you become better. The only way to do that is to know where your problems lie.

~Repeat issues~
~One issue I noticed happened a few times was your placement of quotation marks. A few of the lines have them separated from the actual text. Quotation marks are supposed to touch the words they're surrounding. For example, in one place you have " How did you figure that out?" which should say "How did you figure that out?" instead. It's not often, but it is a repeated issue.

Another repeat problem was some of your usage of commas. Or, more accurately, not using them where you should. In dialogue, any time someone is addressing someone or something by name, there needs to be a comma around that name. So when you write "How far down are you Frank?" you should have a comma after "you". Also, in one place, Frank calls Joe "old man". Since that's replacing Joe's name, it should have a comma, too. In addition to that, there are a few times when you state only a person or a vessel's name as just one sentence. Names aren't stand alone sentences. You should link that to the following sentence with a comma instead of leaving it by itself with a period.

The other repeat issues were only a matter of spelling. I'll list what I found:
beacause = because
maintence = maintenance
vessle = vessel~

Last week a Great White was seen in these waters." ~ A great white is the name of a breed of sharks. It's not a proper noun, so it doesn't need to be capitalized.

My gage says I am already over a hundred feet down ~ Misspelling. A gage is security against a bet or an offering for a challenge. You're looking for gauge here.

there is a storm blowing in from the West. ~ When discussing direction, capital letters aren't needed. Only when discussing a region do you capitalize it. (e.g. "That's how the West was won.")


"I am in a long correidor now ~ Misspelling. It should be "corridor"

Frank. If I don't hear from you in ten minutes I am going to call The Coast Guard ~ The word "the" doesn't need to be capitalized here. It's only Coast Guard that's a proper noun the way you're using it.

Here is the longitude and latitudes..... Hurry! Over"
~ Extending an ellipsis is unnecessary. They're used for the purpose of either showing omission or expressing a long pause, already.

SeaSpray. This is Coast Guard vessle 2648 ~ In this case, "vessel" should be capitalized, as it's part of the identity of the ship, itself.

"Frank, How you doing? ~ "how" shouldn't be capitalized here. It doesn't start a sentence.

Content issues:

There weren't as many content issues I found as with technical issues. It's a fairly well written piece. I'd say that, with just a few adjustments, you have a really well done story here.

~Repeat issues~
~Really the only repeat content problem I found was you not using contractions enough. You have a lot of "I am" statements. It doesn't sound natural. I'd suggest shortening them into "I'm" most of the time.~

Alright, so I'm confused. The two primary characters here are talking a lot like coworkers at the beginning. There doesn't seem to be any particular family connection between them, especially when Frank is called "old man". Then, later in the story, the implication is made that they're brothers. Which is it?

I am rechecking all the gear over up here and all seems to be in working order. ~ The wording on this sentence is difficult to follow without having to pause for a second. That messes with the flow of the story. I'd suggest rewording it. Maybe something to the effect of "I'm up here rechecking all the gear." or "I'm checking the gear over up here." would work more smoothly.

Rating Related: Damn, Frank. ~ This is a major contributor to your rating being incorrect. Any profanity, at all, knocks it out of the E rating right off the bat.

" My name is John and I hope so. ~ Alright there's a couple problems here. I'll quote from the Coast Guard's SOP first. "The Coast Guard follows a standard procedure before boarding. Coast Guard personnel will always properly identify themselves, will always be in uniform, coveralls, or survival suit displaying Coast Guard insignia, and will always operate from a marked Coast Guard or Navy vessel flying the Coast Guard Ensign."

So the two problems here are the fact that your Coast Guard character would have already identified himself before boarding the ship, and then (what isn't explained in this portion of the SOP) that he would have used his rank/rate and last name.

Overall:
So as I said before, I did really enjoy this story. I think you have the workings of a very good piece here. It just needs some minor adjustments. Definitely correct the rating problem.

I hope this has been helpful. Keep on writing.


God bless you!

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
28
28
Review of Why do we do it  
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: E | (3.5)
I can definitely relate to the intent of this message. The piece speaks to the reasoning behind my own enlistment. Okay to be fair, that, and I had no idea what else I was going to do with my life.

Still...

I do have just a couple issues. You refer to the sub as a boat a couple of times. I didn't join the Navy, so this may just be a matter of preference, but I went to an NJROTC high school, and I can clearly recall my Naval Science instructors pounding it into the heads of the entire class that they were NOT boats, they were SHIPS! The one, in particular, who was guilty of this (a CWO5) was also never stationed on a sub. So, again, it may just be a matter of preference.

I found a minor technical issue:

112 other men crossed that brow that morning. ~ I believe this should be "bow" instead of "brow" right?

The other problem I found was in the area of content. The statement was made that it was the first deployment in the two years the couple had been married. However, it also states that he was enlisted before he was married. Assuming that he enlisted, went through basic, got married, then went on to A school...(That's what the Navy calls it, right?) Why has it taken two years for a deployment? Unless this guy is a seabee, it just doesn't work with the way the Navy operates. If he is a seabee, what's he doing on a sub? Even reserves deploy once a year for two weeks. I'd change it around.

All in all, though, as I said before, I enjoyed it. It's a good reminder of why the military does what it does. Or rather, why the people joining the military do what they do.

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
29
29
Review by R. Michael Wood
In affiliation with WdC SuperPower Reviewers Group  
Rated: E | (4.5)
This review is being submitted on behalf of the WDC Power Reviewers:

First impressions:

I've got to say I'm impressed. This is very well written, and I enjoyed it immensely. Honestly I don't think there's a whole lot of work that needs to be done to improve it.

Technical issues:

Okay so I did find a few minor technical problems. But, as I've admitted on my review page, I'm a bit of a grammar nerd. I'll point out what I found.

The first thing I noticed in the realm of the technical was your uses of ellipsis. By common usage, there's no genuine issue with writing them the way you did. To be completely official by the rules of the written language, though, there should be a space on both sides. For, example, your sentence of:
Four boys within five years... there should be written as: Four boys within five years ... there

The other recurring issue I saw was with your use of hyphens. This can be somewhat of a tricky one. However, oftentimes in this piece you utilized hyphens, when commas would have been the appropriate bit of punctuation. On the other hand, there were several times when the hyphens were appropriate. I, unfortunately, am not the best at explaining this particular rule. I'd suggest looking up the usage of the two, as they are often confused (nearly as commonly as e.g. and i.e.).

Aside from those rules, I only found a couple other small problems. Here they are:

Street smarts made us creative though ~ There should be a comma after "creative"

With a tinge of jealousy I for some time afterward rode my bike shouting ~ There should be commas on either side of "for some time afterward"

Content issues:

What can I say? I didn't find anything particularly notable. This story flows well, is worded appropriately and has a good balance when it comes to content.

Overall:

As a whole, again, I feel like this piece is very well written. The admission to obvious embellishment is fun. The one issue I have in the grand scheme is the way you categorized it. There were, absolutely, some funny moments, but I don't know that I'd list it as a comedy before anything else. That, however, is just a matter of personal choice.

Also, I enjoyed the fact that you made reference to the stark differences between today's society and the society of memory. Assuming this is a partially true story, I wasn't around quite as early as you, but I was only a decade or so behind, and my mother came from a very small town, so I was afforded the opportunity to live out this type of childhood, as well.

I believe you've done a very good job here, and if you can be this descriptive in other pieces of writing, you'll do well.

God bless you!



** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
30
30
Review of Cherished Tears  
Review by R. Michael Wood
In affiliation with WdC SuperPower Reviewers Group  
Rated: E | (4.0)
This review is being submitted on behalf of the WDC Power Reviewers

Let me say, from a spiritual perspective, I find this to be great.

Oftentimes when I review poetry, I find myself reviewing purely from a technical standpoint because, to tell the truth, it's very difficult to make a fair judgment on the style of someone's poetry. I haven't written a single line of poetry for over 13 years, and I've never shared it publicly. If any of it still exists, it's only because my wife kept it.

This is going to be the case with this one, as well. I can't detect any flaws in the content or the flow of the piece, itself. And, again, from a spiritual perspective, I love it.

So then...

Technical issues: ~ And to be fair, there weren't really many with this one. The title is the same font, size, and alignment as the poem itself. That pulls attention away from the poem, though for only a moment. I would recommend changing it a little, in at least one of these areas, to make it obviously separate from the body of the poem.

The only other problem I found, was with the capitalization on the first stanza, as opposed to the second. You have every other line capitalized in the first stanza, while every line in the second is capitalized. If you unify these, it will be more visually appealing. I recommend every line capitalized.

Otherwise, I very much enjoy this piece. Well done.

God bless you!




** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
31
31
Review of Girl  
Review by R. Michael Wood
In affiliation with WdC SuperPower Reviewers Group  
Rated: 13+ | (3.0)
This review is being submitted on behalf of the WDC Power Reviewers

I hope I can offer some good suggestions on how to improve your writing, as well as give you encouragement for what I feel you did well.


And now...on to the review!

First impression:
Okay so I'm assuming this was submitted as an entry for the daily flash fiction or something of the sort? I don't often see pieces of such a brief length, and with a word count, unless it's given that specific purpose.

Anyway, that's not all that important. I would say, in general, this piece is pretty well written. It definitely includes most of the necessary elements that a short story requires.

Technical issues:
Well, I didn't really find all that many technical issues here. Your grasp of grammar and punctuation is, for the most part, much better than a lot of people's. I'll point out what I did find, though.

“Have a nice day, Mr. Hinkle!” you say, all cheery and eighteen, your long blond hair working, you’re dimples dimpling, and you might even wiggle your fingers in the air at the last moment before he departs, or seems to be about to depart, but doesn’t… quite… make it out the door—he turns. ~ I don't usually like to copy that much of a piece, but this is the one paragraph I really found multiple issues with, and they're spaced just right to where it really made more sense to do it all at once, so I apologize for the length of this portion of the review...

"you're dimples dimpling" is, if nothing else, the incorrect use of the word you're. It should be "your" in this sentence. Also, saying "dimples dimpling" will certainly stress the point of what dimples do, but it's still repetitive. I'm not sure it works quite as well as intended.

Also, you have a LOT of commas here. Generally I encourage people to use more commas. Very often, they're underused in writing. In yours, however, you may have gotten a little heavy handed with them. I know you need to save room for the sake of length, but breaking up such lengthy sentences makes it easier on the reader. You can always reword a few lines here and there to compensate.

Lastly in this paragraph, you've got a run-on sentence. "He turns." Is a complete sentence. It should stand alone here.

He holds up the sport coat, it’s plaid and it’s ugly, and it’s going on sale in the morning, and you talked him into buying it. ~ You've got a run-on sentence here, too. "He holds up the sport coat." Is a complete sentence. Everything that follows it could also work as a sentence by itself, or as several individual sentences. At the very least, you need a semicolon after "coat" to separate the parts.

Content:
Overall this seems to work pretty well as a piece. I feel like the point is easily conveyed. The main problem I have is with the end. There doesn't seem to be much resolution. I don't know if the ambiguity was intentional or if it just came off that way, but it's clearly there. I'd work on a little more certainty in the ending, even in such short pieces. All in all, it works. Keep writing!


God bless you!
32
32
Review of A Job Done Right  
Review by R. Michael Wood
In affiliation with WdC SuperPower Reviewers Group  
Rated: E | (4.5)
This review is being given on behalf of the WDC Power Reviewers

First off, let me say that the honor you give to fathers here is inspirational. All too often people don't recognize or admit the role fathers play in the lives of children. And that, pretty well, reflects my first impression of this piece.

Content Review:

In the way of the content of the piece, I really only have one possibly negative thing to say. Why the quotation marks around "dad"? That one aspect is a little distracting, though only minutely. Everything else, I feel, is great. The detailed account of a childhood memory combined with the present-day application are wonderful.

Technical Issues:

Alright so, as with the content itself, I find very little wrong in the way of content here. I'll point out the ones I did come across.

I knew better than I every had that the rest of my childhood and young adulthood would be spent biding my time until I could escape his overwatch, but that once I got out, I’d finally be able to be just like everyone else. ~ Though using "every" instead of "ever" is common in the northern parts of the country, it's not, truly, proper English. I don't know if this was intentional or a typo, but there you have it.

Somehow, what “Dad” did to me on that day and throughout my remaining time at home has somehow managed to cling to me. ~ This is really just a matter of the word "somehow" being used twice in such close succession that it becomes repetitive. If you remove one of them (either one should be fine) that issue will be resolved.

Overall, this is a fantastic piece and very inspirational for fathers. Well done.

God bless you!


** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
33
33
Review of TransFormers  
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: E | (1.5)
I definitely have to give you points for creativity here. I'm pretty confused by the seven power rings, though. What, exactly, are those supposed to represent?

I've got other issues (worldview aside) with this piece, too. What's the logic of the addition of Muzzy and Spielberg? It makes no sense even from a satire point of view. Throwing in the "Moses was black." line also seems like you're just fishing for offense.

From a technical aspect, you've got very few quotation marks. The exception to that is the last full paragraph. You have two characters speaking in the same paragraph. That's a grammatical no-no. Lastly, the reasoning for just about any of the events is, well, nonexistent.

All in all it needs a lot of work, even from a non-religious perspective. Let me know if you get it edited. I'll be happy to read it over, again.

God bless you!
34
34
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: E | (1.5)
I certainly appreciate the brevity of this piece.
35
35
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: 13+ | (3.0)
Well from what I can see, this would work pretty well as song, depending greatly on the music to which it's sung. However, from the view of people being able to understand your point, I think you're going to have a hard time. I would suggest limiting the references you made if you want it to be able to be understood easily by a large audience. I write Christian fantasy, so I was easily able to understand all the references to various creatures and beings you mentioned. I don't think that would hold true for most people, though. I'm sure several people would understand some of them, but all isn't as likely.

In the case of grasping the point of the song, it doesn't become clear until about the mid point. If you're going to try to pitch this to a producer or songwriter (I don't know if either of these apply to you.) it will be fairly unlikely that they'll go all the way through it before making a decision, unless you've already worked with them before.

On the other hand, if your goal is to stick with a smaller audience or a local singer/band, then you'll probably be much more successful. I'd suggest, whichever way you go, to try and work in a little more detail about who you're talking to, and/or why.
36
36
Review of Spellslinger  
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: 13+ | (2.5)
I want to apologize right now for poor grammar or spelling in this review. I'm on my phone at the moment.

Wow. You have got a LOT going on with this outline. You've obviously put a lot of thought into this, which I commend you for. I have a few suggestions, though.

Your list of antagonists is highly extensive. If you plan to incorporate all of that into one book, you're going to lose your readers. A series would make it easier.

Second, the combination of,western and fantasy is intriguing, but I think if you try to add in ancient Egyptian mythology, especially to the extent this outline implies, you're going to be overdoing it. That's a lot to try to mingle together.

The third suggestion I have is about your page limit. 200 pages is extremely small for a novel, especially to try and include everything you have outlined. Even young adult novels are generally longer. I'd suggest not having a set page limit in mind.

Overall, if you can pull it off, it sounds interesting. Let me know wen you start on it.

God bless you!

37
37
Review of Connection  
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: E | (2.5)
I'd like to say that the feeling you've intended on this character having is very well expressed. There's no question in my mind of what she's feeling. Good job on that end.

From a technical standpoint, I think a little bit of rewording would do you good. "cya guys later" doesn't read like something someone would actually say. It's like you're trying to force the character to speak in IM language. If you're wanting to save a word, go back in the same line and change "do not mean to be rude" into "don't mean to be rude". To me, that sounds more natural, anyway.

As far as the story content is concerned, This doesn't, really, seem to go anywhere. The character starts off with a problem, and the only resolution I see is that her problem is amplified by the end of the story. Part of what makes a story worth reading is that it provides some type of resolution. This may work as a longer story that could have more fleshed out (I'm assuming this was a flash fiction entry?) but the way it is, it leaves a lot to be desired in the area of feeling complete.

I hope this helps.

God bless you!
38
38
Review of Stars  
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: E | (3.0)
First impressions: I would say, if you're using this as a catalyst for a novel, you might have something worthwhile here. The potential is definitely there.

Technical issues: Given that you specifically mentioned that you really just wrote down something of an idea for a novel, I won't get too much into the technical issues. Just make sure to proofread before you post anything. I generally like to wait a couple days after I've finished what I wrote, maybe write something else, or at least read something else, and then come back to it. That way, it's not so fresh in my mind that what I want to be there isn't accidentally taking the place of what's actually there. That, and don't be afraid of punctuation. Commas are friends, not food...wait that's not right...(Lame joke, I know. Alright moving on.)

And now, on to the content!!: *Delight*

I don't know where any of them went and neither does any other scientist in this world ~ This, obviously, leaves the impression that we're reading the account of a scientist. But, that impression pretty much dies there. Scientists and historians speak about their particular area of study with expertise. I don't get that here. If the character is intended to be a scientist, there needs to be evidence of it in the way he narrates about the disappearance of the stars. If it's not critical to the story, maybe he could just be someone curious about Earth's past, and he enjoys studying the subject.

It worries me sometimes how we can lose a whole part of our culture but then, the old humans did it all the time. ~ I feel like I should be expecting an example here. If this character is writing to an audience in his own time, it seems like they're going to need some proof to back up this claim.

I really like how the rest of this paragraph goes on to highlight the differences between the cultures. If you're going to move on to putting this in a book, I would definitely like to see you expand on that separation between the two. Show me just how stark the differences so the similarities can be all that more impactful.

I don't know what any of those words mean but it must have meant a lot to the old humans because they had millions of books written about them. ~ The statement of not knowing what any of these words mean, for someone who has studied about them, doesn't work. If this character is studying the books that have been written about space and the various stellar bodies, he would be able to easily understand the references. Even if, for some unexplained reason, none of the millions of pictures survived, there are several books that go into great detail about their appearance. You could say something to the effect of 'These words have no depth of meaning.' But to say they're not understandable doesn't fit with the character.

...the lights in the sky are called stars. I don't call them that despite that knowledge. ~ Personally, I don't think that someone who made it a common practice to study the stars would have a problem calling them that, but that's your call. However, I see a major problem with this statement, in the fact that immediately after it, every time the stars are referenced, they're called stars. If you're going to make a claim like this, stick to it. If you don't want to write out "lights in the sky" each time, maybe just cut it down to "lights"

my mind was confused by the idea that a day could be any brighter than it is in the world here. ~ By this point, with this character, I'm feeling that the assumption that this character is either a scientist or a historian is way off. This is where science fiction sometimes gets tricky. Yes, your character may be writing to people in his/her own world who don't need that to be elaborated on, but in reality, people in this world are the ones reading it. Being "confused" by the day being different than it had before will, in fact, confuse your reader. Our days change all the time. Does this version of Earth not have temperature fluctuations? Does whatever source of light they have always put off the same amount of light and heat? Is it always the same distance away from Earth? I'm assuming the sun is gone, too, since every other star vanished? If not, you absolutely will need to go in depth there later in the story. If the days there are always 100% identical, tell us.

Those are the exact words used in every account of that night. ~ Absolute statements are dangerous. Using "every account" says that not one single person who recorded what they observed that night used any different words, at all. This isn't realistic given our world. You could say "almost every account" or "that type of wording is used in every account" but he first thing I thought when I read that statement was either your character only read one or two accounts, or everyone who witnessed the stars falling became robots when recalling what happened.

He usually says this, however, when he's trying to convince us that the almighty God has a say in everything. ~ I, actually do have one technical matter to point out here, if you're referring to the Christian God (which I assume is the case given that it's implying a Catholic priest is the one mentioned here) then Almighty should be capitalized, as well. In the realm of content, again, if this is a Catholic priest, saying that he tries to convince them that God has "a say in everything" doesn't fit. Christians believe that God is sovereign. Ultimately, He has control of everything. I don't know any ministers of any kind who would try to convince someone that God only has "a" say in things.

I know it seems like a lot of picking, and I don't mean to come across as being a big ol' jerk, but I wanted to do a bit more in-depth review than you may generally get. Books are a lot of work, and the more information you have, the better. Let me know when you get more written. I'm interested.

God bless you!
39
39
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
This certainly speaks to the rich fantasy life a lot of children have. It's definitely reminiscent of the one I lived. It's a nice nostalgic view for anyone who had that kind of fantastic childhood. Mine was usually more of a sci-fi spin, but either way, it's all done in the same spirit of imagination and fun.

I only really have a couple minor problems with this piece. The explanation at the end is distracting. I don't really feel that it's necessary. I don't like to be forced back to the world outside of a writing by the writing itself. I guess, for those who know you better, writing this from what seems to be a boy's perspective would be confusing, but if it weren't for the explanation at the end of the piece and the wording of "when we were little girls" in your introduction, I would have had no idea you weren't male.

The other problem I have is the shift in maturity levels of the writing from the first half to the second half. At the beginning, you're using words like "emblazoned", "vanquish" and "valiant", but then you throw in a "kitty", "doggie" and "horsie" and, well, I become disillusioned with the person I'm supposed to be viewing as I read.

As I said before, though, it does a phenomenal job of giving me a 'throwback' feeling. My childhood being filled with imaginative play is a major reason I became interested in writing at the start. Well done.

God bless you!
40
40
Review of May Day of Doom  
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: ASR | (2.5)
Alright, well first off I'd like to say that the overall feel of the piece is good. It's very easy for me to feel the excitement at the beginning, as well as the minor concern and curiosity as the news of the asteroid comes. This pattern follows throughout the story, and I never once question what's going through the minds of the characters. I do have some points of suggested correction to bring up. I'll start with simple grammar:

“Hi mom! Did you the cake for tomorrow?” ~ I assume you meant either "make the cake" or "buy the cake" here, right?
continue to accelerate at a rapid speed but we are told there is no worry about. ~ "nothing to worry about" ?
The crowd of people looked at each other in chock and mumbled fearfully. ~ chock is intended to be "shock" ?
“It’s the end of the world! We’re doomed! said the man who was echoed by the people. ~ You missed the second set of quotation marks on this one.

Aside from those, I'd go back over it and look for places where commas are necessary. I probably use commas a bit more frequently then most others, but there are a lot of times, even just for the sake of grammar rules, more should be added then are. In particular, when someone is addressing another person, there should always be a comma. Some examples would be:
"Hi, dad, it's nice to see you."
"I'll tell you what, Mr. Davis, why don't you come back tomorrow?"
"Where are you going, Jason?"

The other suggested corrections I have are for the wording on the story itself.
and have calculated its trajectory to miss Earth by about four-hundred miles ~ If you're going to write a realistic fiction piece that includes such technical information, make sure it's accurate. An asteroid of that size passing in that proximity of the planet may not do a tremendous amount of damage, but it wouldn't just harmlessly fly by, either. Some research is required to get the intended point across accurately.
It was a brisk and sunny day as food was being placed on them. ~ I figured out that this was talking about the tables, but it takes a second for that to register, because you go from talking about the tables, to mentioning the weather, and then you jump back to the tables. It's not the best flow.
“Please remain calm. Please remain calm,” the voice cried with the people’s yelling overpowering the voice. ~ Putting the word "voice" in here twice at such close interval is repetitive. It doesn't sound appropriate.

NASA is confirming that the immense asteroid is burning up in the atmosphere. We are told to stand by. There was quietness for thirty minutes and then the voice spoke again. The asteroid has burned up!”

The applause was loud and the men and women hugged with some in tears.

“Our planet is not dead meat! Yeah!” yelled John.
~ This is probably going to come off the wrong way, but I don't want to try and soften up my the impression I got from this, either, so I apologize for how blunt this may come across. I feel like the ending is weak. I want some reason why this asteroid is consumed by the fire so quickly, instead of crashing to the planet like any stellar body we know of would do if it were that size. The story simply saying that it just burned up unexpectedly leaves me feeling like I'm a young child listening to an explanation of something complicated from adults who don't want to bother with actually informing me. The other part of it is how empty the reactions of the people are, and the sudden stop at the end of the last line. These people were just in an absolute panic because they thought the entire planet was going to be obliterated, then in an instant, they find out they're safe, and the story, basically, just stops there. I want another couple lines, not necessarily of dialogue, but give me something that helps me understand what happened then. Something like:

"That May Day celebration was the most joyous any of them would ever recall."

Like I said at the beginning, there are certainly good elements, and most of the suggested corrections I put down are rather minor issues, but in my point of view, the ending needs some at least moderate revising. I hope this helps. Again, I'm sorry if the last bit came across as rude.

God bless you
41
41
Review of The Sirens.  
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: E | (3.0)
I'd say this does a pretty good job of describing the folklore around sirens. All the accounts you hear in mythology follow along pretty well with what you've written here. Good job on that end.

I'm curious why you chose to capitalize Siren, though. In all the tales I've heard siren is a race, rather than a single individual, and your poem certainly seems to follow this line of thought. Also, in the realm of capitalization, each line seems to be pretty randomized in this regard. The only other critique I found was in your stanzas. You've got all four line stanzas except for the third. It's only three. It messes with the flow of the poem.
42
42
Review of I am a out cast  
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: ASR | (4.5)
To be honest I'm somewhat surprised to see something like this posted here. Then again, I haven't really been a member all that long, so maybe I just need to look a little more. That being said...on to the review.

Ultimately, I genuinely respect the fact that you stand up for your beliefs with such tenacity. Do I have the same fiery passion for my own faith in Jesus? Absolutely! Do I believe everything the same way as you? No. Nevertheless, your willingness to stand up and let your position be known is a noble one.

Now, for a bit of advice, be open to correction in your beliefs. No, I am absolutely NOT saying to simply take someone's word for something in this area. (Or any area, really, but that's a different point. :D ) What I am saying, is weigh ALL of your beliefs, as well as EVERYTHING you hear, against the Bible. What do you believe? Why? If your answer even comes close to 'because I was taught that way' then check it!

God bless you!
43
43
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: E | (4.0)
I like the playfulness of your poem here. I don't, often, see sports in poems. When I do, it's pretty much always some overly serious "why this sport is the greatest" bit written by someone who seems to have a grudge against absolutely everyone who even dares to disagree with them.

My only real critique here would be that the flow seems just a little rough on a couple lines. Maybe I'm just pacing my reading wrong, not sure. All in all, though, well done.
44
44
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: 13+ | (3.5)
I feel like you have the potential for some very good writing here. There's definitely some depth to the story, itself. I do have some concerns, however.

Initially, I feel that, while the story has good depth, the way you've constructed most of your sentences needs some work. It seems like you're trying to make simple sentences, but still have a descriptive story. In some cases you could combine sentences, in others you could use more description, your last paragraph, for instance, could read something like this:

Far too many things tell me that difficult choices are coming for me to doubt it. I don't understand all of it, but there are some things I have figured out. The Old Man helps me with this, as he directs me towards things I had never considered to consider. He's helping me put together several pieces that have been both undiscovered and lost.

Obviously that's just a suggestion, and I tried to not, completely, rewrite what you put down, but I hope that gives you some idea of what I mean.

Additionally, I would make a point of re-reading what you've written every few chapters. This is one of the best methods I've found for spotting grammatical and spelling errors. It allows for some time to give your mind a break from what you wrote. If you read it over much sooner than that, it's so fresh in your mind that you often won't catch them, since you know what you meant to write.

I hope this helps. God bless!

44 Reviews · *Magnify*
Page of 2 · 25 per page   < >
Printed from https://p15.writing.com/main/profile/reviews/deaconmission/sort_by/r.review_creation_time DESC/page/2