*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
Printed from https://p15.writing.com/main/profile/reviews/deaconmission
Review Requests: OFF
85 Public Reviews Given
85 Total Reviews Given
Review Style
If you're a newbie (you've been a member 30 days or less) then just send me an email. I post plenty of free reviews on this site. No need to spend your precious few reward points on me. However, the piece you want me to review still needs to fit within my guidelines. I'll always point out what I liked about a piece, as well as what I feel needs to be improved upon. I'll hit on both technical issues, as well as story content and overall feel of a piece. I like to be as encouraging as possible, without detracting from what I feel needs to be improved.
I'm good at...
I am, by my own admission, a bit of a grammar nerd. I also understand that, in creative writing, sometimes the rules have to be bent. I'm good at giving credit where credit is due. If you've put in effort, I'll notice. I don't expect a piece to be perfect, but if you don't care about your work, you can't expect someone else to care.
Favorite Genres
Fantasy, Sci-Fi, Religious, Action/Adventure
I will not review...
Anything with overly offensive content. Use your own bit of judgment here. If you wouldn't expect me to let my kids read it, I don't want to read it, either.
Public Reviews
Previous ... -1- 2 ... Next
1
1
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: E | (1.0)
Um, so I clicked on the read and review link and this popped up. Clearly, this isn't completed, or, perhaps, isn't even intended to be something that someone else sees. I would suggest transferring this to a private item. The way you have it set up now, I probably won't be the only person to come across it this way.
2
2
Review by R. Michael Wood
In affiliation with WdC SuperPower Reviewers Group  
Rated: E | (2.5)
This review is being given on behalf of the WDC Power Reviewers


Special Notes:
~I am not an industry professional. My opinions are just that. Opinions. I'm learning just like you.*Smile*
~This is your writing, not mine. Do with it what you want. It's entirely likely that my view of the writing isn't in line with your vision for it.*Wand*


First Impressions:I like the content of the story. Sci-fi and fantasy are my two favorite genres, and you have an entertaining storyline going on here.


What did I think to tell you after I finished my review?
Alright so you've got a lot of small technical issues, and a few content issues. Rather than go over all of them individually, I've provided somewhat of a summary overview of the whole story.


Rating Issues: You might consider bumping this up to the next rating level. The adventure and danger aspect of it move it out of the E category.


Technical Issues:
You have a lot of strange conjunctions in this piece. That's fine when you're using dialogue. But, when you're using narration, doing abnormal conjunctions makes the piece hard to read. Things like ship'd and they'd in narration should really be replaced by the full words.

Some of your paragraphs seem to run together. To avoid this, you can either indent each paragraph, or add another line between them. Some type of separation, anyway. *Smile*

You have some areas where one character speaks, and then the other performs some sort of action in the same paragraph. That's a big no-no. Any time a character is speaking, that paragraph should be solely about them. If another character does something, that needs to be a new paragraph.

Content Issues:
There are a lot of areas where the flow of the sentence is off, largely due to punctuation. A good tip I've found is to read through the story out loud. Pause anytime you get to a comma, period or semicolon. If you hear something off, change it. (Add or take away some type of punctuation.) If it still sounds wrong, consider rewording or moving around sentences. Also, keep an eye out for missing quotation marks.

Your characters' dialogue seems a little peculiar. You have characters that are well educated enough to figure out precise enough coordinates on Pangea to pinpoint an exact location, or who will use phrases like We should've listened to Zora and analyzed her strange anomalies of the Ionosphere." But, at the exact same time, that character also says things like I ain't a paleontologist. I'm a Space Pilot. and "It's not yet borned,. It doesn't fit together, very well.



Overall:The story itself is good, but all the little problems take away a lot of what could be very enjoyable content. I'd definitely suggest working on it. Again, read it out loud and fix what you find that way.

God bless you!
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
3
3
Review of Specters  
Review by R. Michael Wood
In affiliation with WdC SuperPower Reviewers Group  
Rated: 13+ | (4.5)
This review is being given on behalf of the WDC Power Reviewers


Special Notes:
~I am not an industry professional. My opinions are just that. Opinions. I'm learning just like you.*Smile*
~This is your writing, not mine. Do with it what you want. It's entirely likely that my view of the writing isn't in line with your vision for it.*Wand*


First Impressions: This starts off as a very sweet interaction. I like how you make it very personal.


What did I think to tell you after I finished my review? You have great foreshadowing here. I love it when authors allow the reader to figure something out before it's "revealed" later on. I figured out Harold was a ghost right where I would assume you wanted people to figure it out. That's a fantastic literary tool that keeps people coming back for more. Readers love to think they've beaten the author to the punch.


Rating Issues: None. This seems to be very appropriately rated.


Technical Issues:
You wrote Harold hows he is in heaven
I assume this should be Harold "knows", and Heaven is a proper noun in this context.

I thought the "Grampa" thing was just the child's way of addressing her grandfather. But, you've got "Gramma" written outside of dialogue. They should be spelled "Grandpa" and "Grandma"

You wrote What stands out most isone phrase: his name
That should be "is one phrase". Also, the colon isn't used properly here. Colons are very rarely used for informal writing, such as stories. In this case, there should be a comma.

You wrote didn't come from the door: it come from inside somewhere.
An earlier instance of the colon being used. If you want this to be one sentence, that should be a semicolon, instead.


Content Issues: Nothing major stuck out. I would recommend reading over it out loud once or twice to make sure that it flows the way you want it to flow.


Overall: I really enjoyed your story. I see why it was a contest winner. Outside of a few small technical errors, and potentially a hiccup or two in the flow, it's dazzling. Great job!

God bless you!
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
4
4
Review of Frozen in XOL  
Review by R. Michael Wood
In affiliation with WdC SuperPower Reviewers Group  
Rated: E | (4.0)
This review is being given on behalf of the WDC Power Reviewers


Special Notes:
~I am not an industry professional. My opinions are just that. Opinions. I'm learning just like you.*Smile*
~This is your writing, not mine. Do with it what you want. It's entirely likely that my view of the writing isn't in line with your vision for it.*Wand*
~I'm extremely picky with my rating system. One and five star ratings almost never happen in my reviews.


Okay then. On with the review!

First Impressions:
The story has an intriguing beginning. I like the way you're starting off.


What did I think to tell you after I finished my review? I'd be interested to see anything else you have referencing this game. Be careful with the name, though. There's already a pen and paper RPG called "Rifts"


Rating Issues: Given the air of adventure this hints toward, you might consider bumping the rating up one notch.


Technical Issues:
You might want to go and double check the paragraph formatting here. It looks like you might have used a word processor (perfectly acceptable) that didn't like the formatting all that much. You've got on paragraph that is set up pretty oddly.

There are a few minor punctuation errors, mostly just in regards to comma placement.


Content Issues: I'd recommend reading through it out loud to make sure that it flows the way you want it to. It does seem to be a little choppy with how it reads. Maybe move some words around, add or remove punctuation, other little things like that.


Overall: I like what you have going here. This could turn out to be a very interesting game if the story line follows this pattern.

All reviews I give to newbies who do well get 1,000 GP. Congratulations!
God bless you!

** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
5
5
Review of The Homecoming  
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: 13+ | (3.5)
This review is being given on behalf of the WDC Power Reviewers


First Impressions: I like the set up. It feels like a chapter in what could be a much longer story.


What did I think to tell you after I finished my review?


Rating Issues: None. This seems to be appropriately rated according to WDC rating standards. Good job.


Technical Issues:
There are a lot of comma breaks in places where they don't need to be. This interrupts the flow of the story quite a bit. One good way to check for proper placement of commas is to read the sentences out loud. Pause every time you get to a comma. If it sounds natural, you're probably fine. If it doesn't, adjust accordingly.

You wrote: If she did not arrive in the next 36 hours, on it's automated flight path, it would
You referred to the ship as a "she" here, but then immediately switched to calling the ship "it". While changes like this aren't, necessarily, against the practice of creative writing, doing it in the middle of a sentence throws a huge wrench into the flow of the reading. I had to go back several times to make sure you weren't referring to another character when you said "she".

You wrote: That still meant it would still take four years to arrive after launch.
This is redundant with using "still" twice. Also, the flow is off by putting the "after launch" at the end. I suggest something to the effect of "It would still take four years after launch to arrive."

In your paragraph describing why Ambrosia was moved up and the issues that followed, you change to present tense, while the rest of the story is in past tense. Instead of using phrases like "Six months ago" or "why she may miss us", change it to something like "six months before" and "why we thought she could miss us" to keep in line with past tense.

You wrote: It felt like being on death row waiting for execution or clemency, so I took a break and went to the observation room to watch the sunset and think.
Run-on sentence. You have two independent clauses (full sentences, basically) on either side of a comma. A period or semicolon should be used, instead.

BIG problem: This is a copywrite eligible piece. You used Captain Kirk by name. Unless you obtained permission, that's a violation of copywrite laws. You can use a phrase like "I was reminded of a character off those old space adventure shows." But all of the characters are copywrite.

Content Issues:
So, in the beginning of your story you have the Ambrosia on an automated flight plan that puts it close enough to the sun that it can burn up and be destroyed. This leaves the reader with questions. What happened that it was it programmed with such an irresponsible flight plan to begin with? How is it supposed to land if it's automatically going to go too close to the sun? Some of this is answered later on, but foreshadowing of some kind would help.

You wrote: "After three weeks of working around the clock, Ambrosia was rebooted, back on line and communicating."
How was anybody able to reboot the ship if it wasn't communicating and not responding to ground control commands? This should probably be fleshed out more.

You use a lot of description after your dialogue. This isn't always a bad thing, but more often than not, the reader can't get into dialogue if it's broken up by a lot of action and description. I'd recommend either putting the description of what's going to happen before the dialogue, or using a different paragraph to flesh out what's happening. Most editors and writers will say that the only thing you should use to tell the reader who is speaking is 'he said' or something to that effect. Basically anything other than "said" draws them away from your characters' interaction.

So the landing of the survival-critical supply ship is being headed up by the second in command? Everything about official operations that I know screams that your main character should be the one controlling. As it stands, he's just a bystander. If you're going to do something like that, explain why the second is heading it up. Maybe he's more extensively trained in emergency landing procedures? Is he a former flight controller so he's just more experienced?

Also about your use of Captain Kirk, the original Star Trek series didn't have the chest communicators. Those didn't show up until The Next Generation. That would be Captain Picard. But still...copywrite.

You wrote: "I'm looking toward Marshmallow but I don't see her," said Mark over the communicator. and "Holy crap, she's behind me. Under chutes. Panels missing down one side. She's damaged but she made it. She's on the ground!" Mark whooped and hollered. "She's about 200 yards south of Marshmallow."
Okay Mark has got to be the absolute worst spotter I've ever even heard of. 200 yards away from where it was supposed to land isn't very far, at all. And if that puts the ship behind him, he's extremely close to where it should have landed (Less than two football fields away.) Was there no vapor trail or smoke trail as this ship entered the atmosphere? Could he not hear anything?

Overall:This has the beginnings of a good story. It certainly leaves you intrigued as to what the point of being on the planet is. You hint at it, but there's not any development there. With some work, this could be fleshed out into a pretty impressive short story.

God bless you!
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
6
6
Review of Why in the World?  
Review by R. Michael Wood
In affiliation with WdC SuperPower Reviewers Group  
Rated: E | (5.0)
I'm not going to bother loading a review template with this piece.

For the record, I just about never rate something 5 stars. I'm extremely analytical and a grammar snob.

This piece, however, seems to deserve it, in my opinion.

I am curious. Was the dream you described actually a dream or is it a perspective you've obtained overtime? Whatever the answer, I appreciate the point of view. There have been a few times in my life when I questioned God's reasoning for creating the universe. But, it was never a serious enough question to make me actually consider the answer.

Thank you for sharing this. I don't need the thousand gift points for reviewing it, so you can have them back.

God bless you!
7
7
Review by R. Michael Wood
In affiliation with WdC SuperPower Reviewers Group  
Rated: ASR | (2.5)
This review is being given on behalf of the WDC Power Reviewers


All right, so I'm going to try to take this on as a review. This is the longest piece I've ever reviewed, so it's likely to be the longest review I've ever given.

Please bear with me.

On with the review!

First Impressions:

I enjoyed the story, itself. I'm a big fan of fantasy and science fiction styles. Beyond that, the plot of the story is well done. Good job, in that regard.

Post-review note: What did I think to tell you after I finished my review, that I wanted you to know before you read further? I found a fairly large number of issues with this piece. So, let me qualify everything you're about to encounter by repeating what you just read above. I really did enjoy your story. I don't enjoy harping on the negative aspects of a piece. However, I find that I grow the most as a writer when people highlight my flaws far moreso than when they highlight my successes. That being the case, please take the seemingly negative comments that follow in light of my desire for all the writers I review to become better at their craft.

Rating Issues: PLEASE PAY ATTENTION!!
You have this listed as an ASR rating. Normally, I would say that's an appropriate rating. However, the presence of stronger language changes that. Think of the ratings on here like movie ratings. E is for everyone, so is a G rated movie. PG is for parental guidance, so is ASR. The presence of an F-bomb would, immediately, put any movie into a minimum of a PG-13 rating. Similarly, that one word, by itself, places this into at least a 13+ category.

Technical Issues: I did spot several issues that fall into the technical category. Most of them are repeat problems, so I haven't quoted each occurrence. I explain each of the problems after the quotes I do have.

it's vs its - Okay, this one traps a lot of authors, because the rule is unique to the word "it". If you write "it's" then you're writing "it is". If you want it to be possessive, then you need to write "its". Any other time you make a noun or pronoun possessive, then it would be written with an apostrophe.

You wrote 'Sounds like a plan' Harold smiled at his friend's cynicism - Problem #1, repeat issue - Use of wrong quotation marks. Basically it comes down to this. When writing a direct quote, as with most dialogue in literature, you should be using double quotation marks (" ") rather than single (' '). Single ones are for, most often, paraphrasing.

Problem #2, repeat issue - Placement of periods. This one is pretty basic. If the quote the character is speaking is a complete sentence, you end it with the appropriate punctuation (. ? !) even if it comes in the middle of the surrounding sentence.

You wrote (3 examples) Halfway between the dragons and the giants Harold stopped, he drew his sword from it's sheath and held it's pommel to the sky, the ruby mounted there glittered in the sun, then he stabbed it into the earth in front of him and stood back with arms crossed, clearly unwilling to move forward another step.

For a moment silence reigned, the wind stirred the grass around them, a vulture wheeled overhead, and then a command issued from the line of giants

The row of men contrasted marvellously against the dragon riders, each golem pilot being short and swarthy rather than tall and fair, and each man wearing a long robe of intricate patterns rather than the tight riding-leathers of the hill-men.
-

Problem #1, repeat issue. Run-on sentences. You have quite a few of these throughout your story. My suggestion would be to go back through and look carefully for anything that is a complete idea, and make that a sentence by itself. If there's additional information surrounding it, ask yourself if that makes up another complete thought (if so, it's another sentence), if you need to add something to make it one (another complete sentence) or if it should stay with the previous sentence. Try for as many sentences as possible, at first. As you get used to it, you can stretch some out, a bit more.

Problem #2, repeat issue. Punctuation. Again, this is fairly common in this piece. There are quite a few places where a comma or semicolon should be inserted. (For simplicity sake, ignore the semicolon, for now.) A few simple rules for when to use a comma are: Any time you would hear a natural pause in a sentence - any time you're splitting up list items - any time you're addressing someone (e.g. "How's it going, Stan?"). There are other times where one should be used. However, stick with these three, at the beginning.

Problem #3. Typo "marvellously" is incorrect. It should be "marvelously"

You wrote the armour i wear now - Capitalize the I

You wrote 'Ill kill you!' Harold said, - Should be "I'll kill you!"


Content Issues:
I didn't do a word count, so I'm just going to utilize the one you provided. Your story consists of 5,000 words. That comes out to approximately 2 1/2 chapters in the average fantasy novel. In that period you use detritus, cynicism, trepidation, implausibility, diatribe, stratagem, reticent, stoically, precipitous, interminable and miasma. I am impressed with your ability to use so many complex words in a relatively short span of writing. I commend your vocabulary. However, that's 11 words that the average reader isn't likely to know without having to, at least, break their concentration on the story to use the context to figure out the meaning. Even worse would be if they felt the need to look up some of the words. Worse, still, would be if they move on without knowing the definition of the word, at all. All of these are likely to happen.

Keep in mind that you're not writing to other writers. You're writing to readers, and you want to keep them engaged. By all means, use larger vocabulary, but make sure it's necessary, and the meaning is clear.

You wrote - The sky above is cloudless but a wedge of blurry shapes is coming into view, flying from the direction of the mountains, greater than any bird, vast scaly wings in every colour of the rainbow, long serpentine bodies writhing sinuously through the wind, gleaming talons capable of tearing a deer to shreds in an instant glistening with natural oils. - Technical problems aside (I already covered them), I used this an example of an issue with the tenses you're using. You've mixed past and present tense in one story. True, the only time you use present tense is when you're describing the upcoming scene. However, that style of narration only works if there isn't any mixing later on. (Theatrical plays often use present tense narration.) Try making your narrative all past tense. Modern readers are far more accustomed to it.

You wrote 'Can't afford to be you mean.' - This example of missing commas caught me pretty quickly. I had to go back and read it a few times to make sure I know what you meant. At first, I thought you just had words in the wrong place and you meant "You can't afford to be mean.".

You wrote 'We have located their mother. If she can be destroyed before she births another queen this threat can be ended before it begins.

'So we'll air drop you right into the queen's lap'
- You refer to the progenitor of these creatures as a mother, at first. But, it's the only time. When I read this, I thought "Okay so there's some alpha creature who creates queens. Fair enough." But then you started talking about the queen already being there. I was taken aback.

You wrote 'F*** you! Lets have it out right now then! - The problem I have here, more than anything, is that this is meant to be a high fantasy story. We have creatures and professions that will never exist in this world, a culture totally foreign to anyone living on this planet, and a seemingly highly educated nobleman using the most basic of offensive terms in modern day Earth culture. it doesn't fit with the character or the story.

You wrote ...the iron giants were lifted off... - Inadvertent movie reference. "The Iron Giant" is going to bring thoughts to someone's mind that has nothing to do with your story. Plus, this is the only time you refer to them as being iron. If you want to stick with iron, use a word other than giants, if you're staying with giants, don't use iron.

You wrote Harold sat atop his great red dragon bow in hand Another stand-out example of commas being needed. When I first read this, I thought you were saying he was sitting on his bow.

tarrasque - Unless I'm mistaken, this is a creature unique to pen and paper gaming circles. While you are likely to have a higher percentage of these people reading fantasy stories than most other genres, (sci-fi, potentially, being the exception) don't count on everyone who looks into your story to know what that creature is. And, for that matter, don't count on everyone who reads it and has played pen and paper games to know about this creature. I fall into the latter category, myself. I had to look it up, detracting from the flow of the story.

ammit - So Ammit is an ancient Egyptian goddess. While this does, technically, qualify as a mythical creature, you describe, in the story, as if it's another species of creature. Beyond that, this is another example of the average reader not knowing what you're talking about.

Overall:
Again, let me state that I did enjoy your story. However, your writing style does need some work. I would make a very strong suggestion that you try to find a writing group in your area. They can be immensely helpful. (C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien were both in the same writing group.)

Go over this piece with a careful eye and a fine-toothed comb. There's a good amount of improving to be done. The good thing about that is, you're in the right spot to get it.

Keep writing!

God bless you!
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
8
8
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: 13+ | (3.5)
This review is being given on behalf of the WDC Power Reviewers


First Impressions:
I like this as a first chapter. It is a little short, but your beginning is intriguing and what character development you have seems to be on track.

Rating Issues:
None. From what I've seen, this seems to be a reasonable rating.

Technical Issues:
"Branston's node wrinkled at the rancid breath." ~ Typo. Should be "nose"

Content Issues:
Your paragraph breaks are a bit of an issue. It's difficult to follow the flow of the story with so many small lines. There are several spots where your lines could be combined into one larger paragraph. It would not only make it more asthetically appealing, but would be easier to read.

Also, when Faldashir is struck by the crossbow bolt, we're given a grunt, but nothing else. We're never told where he was hit, and when we see him in the next little bit, no mention is made of favoring any part of his body. This is a bit frustrating (not majorly). I'd suggest making mention of what happened here.

Overall:
With just a few small edits, this would be a great first chapter. Consider adding some length. Otherwise, I like it.

Keep writing!

God bless you!
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
9
9
Review of Promised Land  
Review by R. Michael Wood
In affiliation with WdC SuperPower Reviewers Group  
Rated: E | (4.0)
This review is being given on behalf of the WDC Power Reviewers


First Impressions: I like the perspective of someone whose been around a bit longer than me. I'm no longer the young man I once was, but I've still got some time to go before I reach retirement age.


Rating Issues: Please pay attention here. This isn't quite as big of a deal as it is for some of the other pieces I've seen. However, I believe, given the references to alcohol, this piece would be better rated at an ACR, instead of an E. I generally think of an E rating like a G movie.


Technical Issues: This is, honestly, just a matter of preference. I feel that it would look better if you had each line of the various stanzas starting with a capital letter. Truth be told, it's not mandatory


Content Issues: Nothing major to report on this front. I think the pacing of a couple of the lines is slightly off from what was set during the rest of the poem. Maybe consider changing a couple words around here and there?


Overall: All told, I enjoyed this piece. Again, thank you for the perspective.

God bless you!
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
10
10
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: E | (4.5)
I like the way this story is starting out. There's a lot of room for what you can do with it from this point. Given that this is such a short part, it piques my curiosity.

What's she going to do? What's going to happen?

Aside from spelling Tann differently at the beginning, (Tan on the first mention) I didn't notice any technical errors.

I'd say you have some pretty strong foreshadowing as to the mermaid being real. It leads me, at least, to question if the mermaid might be Tann's mother or simply a relationship that her father once had.

Keep going with this story; and keep me apprised of its progress. I'd like to see where you go with this.

God bless you!


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!.
11
11
Review of Stampede  
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: E | (4.5)
This presents an interesting bit of history of which I was unaware.

Yes, I've seen the pictures of the famed carousel. However, I'd never heard the tale of its near destruction.

Thank you for enlightening me to it. I think I'll take the time to look up a more in depth account of its history.

Good job. Thank you.

Gid bless you!
12
12
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: E | (4.5)
And I think we're approaching it turning 20.

I wasn't around WDC for this contest. Still, this seems like it was well thought-out. I must admit, it was the title that caught my eye. I don't know how many times I've been stuck with writer's block and thought I might as well just admit it on paper.

Of course, if the internet was new when you were 10, that makes you a bit younger than me. Thankfully, not by much.

Well done on this. It was entertaining.

Keep writing.


God bless you!


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!.
13
13
Review of Looking down  
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: ASR | (2.5)
Okay so I'm having some difficulty finding the entire point of this. it seems like it could be pretty amusing if it were fleshed out more.

Your character certainly seems like an entertaining one. I've known a few people who seem to act like her. Providing they didn't, honestly, think they were communicating with inanimate objects, they were pretty entertaining to be around.

I'd suggest going back through this and doing something else with the story. I don't, currently, see a problem or resolution. I suppose the argument can be made that waiting for the mailman was the problem. But the sudden appearance of what she was waiting for eliminates that almost instantly.

Your character is definitely fun. Just work on the surrounding story more.
14
14
Review of The Bishop's Son  
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: 13+ | (2.5)
Wow. I've got to say tgat was definitely fast paced. Usually a short story focuses on one section of someone's life. This is especially true in flash fiction. There simply isn't enough time to build up character and plot when going over a large portion of time. I think you fell victim to that here.

This has the makings of being a very interesting story. Unfortunately, given the length, it feels more like a synopsis of a book. I saw the end coming as soon as it was mentioned that the antagonist had a son. There's not enough break to avoid major foreshadowing.

On a purely grammatical level, you've got "swaps" where, I believe, you meant swamps.

My primary suggestion would be to lengthen this story. Give the characters some depth. Add some backstory.

Like I said, this could be a very good story, but I don't think it works well for flash fiction.


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!.
15
15
Review of Prisoner Intro  
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: 18+ | (1.0)
So, let me see if I have this straight. According to your synopsis, Rose's mother died several months ago. In the introduction Rose is 5.

Also in your synopsis, it states that she can't cope with her mother's death, he turns to reckless behavior as a result. She winds up in the arms of some strange man.

I sincerely hope you meant to say that her mother's death happened several years ago. Otherwise, your story is going to be fraught with pedophilia.
16
16
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: E | (3.5)
I appreciate the in depth information on England being different from the UK. While I never had an issue distinguishing between the two, myself, it is always nice to see others grasp the general concept.

I would offer a suggestion, though. While your at it, you may as well explain the difference between Britain and Great Britain. Or at the very least mentioned that Great Britain is another name for the UK.
17
17
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: E | (2.5)
Let me start off by saying that I am a born again believer. I practice my faith openly and make no apologies for my devotion to Jesus. Thank you, very much, for posting an item based purely on salvation.

That being said, the review that follows is exclusively for the sake of providing constructive feedback to the written words, themselves. When I spot issues, I'll quote them with italics then write my suggestions immediately after each quote. I'll be reviewing this on the assumption that you're intending it to be read by non-believers.

Ordinarily, I split my reviews into various sections. However, this particular piece is short enough, I'll just run down as I spot issues.

ON WITH THE REVIEW!!

The Bible reveals the truths that when you give your life to Jesus (Grace), you have been received by hearkening the word of God and must know who you are in Christ (Grace), how you walk, and please God.
Who you are in Jesus (Grace)?
~ In these three parts, you have the mention of grace in parenthesis. I thought I understood the intent with the first one, but the existence of the other two make me question that. Why, exactly, are they there?

You are in Christ and Christ in you. An instant miracle has taken place. Therefore, you must read the Bible to get the knowledge of God and know who you are in Christ. ~ While I don't disagree with the point you're making that a new Christian needs to read the Bible in order to gain wisdom, the way you presented this information doesn't fit here. The way this is worded says 'Since a miracle has taken place, you need to read your Bible.' I would suggest adding something about God's Word explaining the miracle and giving further instruction.


You are made righteous, redeem, sanctified and holy. ~ I believe you intended this to say "redeemed"

You are God beloved, joint heir with God. ~ Purely grammatical here, this should say something to the effect of "and a joint heir with God." Side note, also, while Jesus is, in fact, God, not using the specification of Jesus or Christ in the joint heir section would make this quite confusing for a non-believer.

God gives you power, he gives you wisdom. ~ Run-on sentence. This can be two different sentences. Also, as you are referring to God, the H should be capitalized. "He gives you wisdom." This happens a few other times in your piece. Just read over it, again, and fix it.

(Philemon Chapter 1:6) ~ There is no Chapter 1:6. Simply saying 1:6 is sufficient. If you want to specify chapter versus verse, then "Philemon Chapter 1, verse 6" would work.

That the communication of thy faith may become effectual by the acknowledging of every good thing which is in you in Christ Jesus. ~ Okay, even I'm a little confused by this line. I believe I know what you mean, but I'm not positive on that. I don't know that your intended point is going to come across to a non-believer well, at all.


You must walk by faith and not by sight. You walk in the spirit. What is faith? ~ You throw walking in the spirit into the middle of the topic of walking by faith. I understand how these are connected, but a non-believer, or even new believer, most likely won't.

What is faith? Faith is a positive response to what has already been done when Jesus went to the cross decades ago. The highest level of faith is resting. ~ Going to step out of the writing review mode for just a second. Curiosity strikes here. Why did you choose to use a different definition of faith than what the Bible provides? If you're attempting to lead people to Jesus with this writing, I would think Biblical authority would trump anything else you could come up with yourself, or quote from another source.

The same applies to the next sentence in your piece. I can't say that I've ever heard a teaching on different levels of faith. Types of faith, yes, but levels? If your point is to reach non-believers, stick with the fundamentals of salvation. Stick, exclusively, with what's in the Bible. And double check EVERYTHING you present to a non-believer with the Bible before you share it with them.

Okay, back to reviewer mode.

that what you are believing for is already been taken care of. ~ Should read "has already been..."

Healing is finish ~ Should read "finished".

Sometimes, it hard but you’ll get there. ~ Should read "Sometimes, it's hard; but, you will get there."

When you give is honoring God, you give thanks, worship and praise, trust and obey. ~ I'm guessing on your intent here. Possibly "When your giving is honoring God, you give thanks, worship and praise, trust and obey." or "When you give it is honoring God. You give thanks, worship and praise, trust and obey."

bible base church and find the time to get a relationship with God. ~ Should read "Bible based church, and find the time..."

Overall suggestions:

Bearing in mind that I'm looking at this, or at least trying to, from the perspective of a new or non-believer, I suggest going back over this piece and reworking some of the vocabulary. I have yet to meet anyone born in this century who uses "thy" in regular conversation. Similarly, I would reconsider the more complex words such as "hearkening" and "effectual".

I like the KJV Bible. It's a good translation. But I can count on one hand the number of people I know who were witnessed to exclusively from the KJV before they were saved. Conversely, more modern translations (PLEASE use a translation from the manuscripts, not a paraphrase *shudder*) don't require the reader to translate the words in their mind anywhere near as often, which allows them to focus on the content of the message, rather than the definitions of the words they've read.

The same can be said about your piece here. Use easier to understand phrases and you'll have a much better time BEING understood.

Again, thank you for posting an item focused on salvation. It's nice to see.

God bless you.
18
18
Review of Serpent lies...  
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: E | (4.0)
I, honestly, don't know what to think about this piece. I like the concept behind it. However, the flow of the reading is getting to me.

Beyond that, I had some trouble following the main point until I reached the end.

I feel like the writing, by itself, is well done, and my issues may just be due to a lack of sleep on my part.

All in all, well done.
19
19
Review by R. Michael Wood
In affiliation with WdC SuperPower Reviewers Group  
Rated: 13+ | (3.5)
This review is being submitted by your request.


First Impressions:
This piece is very well written. The explanations of military terms make it easy for a non military person to understand precisely what you mean.


Rating Issues:
Given the nature of this piece, I would suggest raising the rating to a 13+. It's a bit on the violent side for an ASR, in my opinion.


Technical Issues:
There are a few instances where the spacing of your paragraphs doesn't match up. It can be tricky, if you're copying from a word processor, to get all that correct. I'd go back over it and check it for continuity reasons.

Also, you're inconsistent with your capitalization of "platoon". The only time it should be capitalized would be if you were saying something to the effect of "Echo Platoon" or whatever the actual name of the platoon is. Any other time (e.g. reconnaissance platoon, my platoon, platoon sergeant, etc.) it's not a proper noun so it's not capitalized. An argument could be made for reconnaissance platoon, but that's still not an actual name. It's a type of platoon.

Content Issues:
(I noted 43 in my platoon; I lost six men over the past 8 days, 2 KIA and 4 WIA so I’m down to 37). Bummer! Good men, good friends, brave soldiers. At least two of the WIA’s will rejoin the platoon in a few weeks, their wounds were not that serious, the other two – they’ll be on the freedom bird heading home soon. Some call it, Million Dollar Wounds, but missing limbs and legs are worth more than a million dollars, if you ask me.

Alright I don't usually quote such big sections, but there's one continual problem with this second half of the paragraph. The first half of the paragraph is talking about the age comparison of everyone in the platoon. You included a small interlude in parenthesis, but finished the paragraph with a followup on what was inside the parenthesis. In this case, you're better off just making all of that a new paragraph.

Also, (and this is actually a technical issue but I don't like repeating quotes) in this same section, it should say "million dollar wounds" with the quotation marks. Again, that's not a proper noun so the capitalization is incorrect.

Overall:
Here's where the "big" negative comment comes in. Brace yourself. Ready for it? Okay here it comes. As I said before, this piece is very well written. In fact, it's too well written.

WHAT?!

Alright here's what I mean. You note, at the very beginning, that this is a journal entry. I served with a lot of guys, and I've seen a lot of journal entries from a combat zone. Almost NONE of them were ever this articulate. That can be overlooked because, well, I'm a vet and fairly articulate in writing, myself. However, I've never spoken to another vet who had to explain to themselves what certain phrases were referencing. If I'm writing in my journal and I complain about getting HMMWVs instead of UPHMMWVs, or about being shorted on the numbers of SAWs we were given, I wouldn't need to tell myself what I meant. Similarly, you've got this journal entry explaining what an LRRP or an RPG is. It takes away from the entire illusion of this being written from the perspective of an NCO in combat.

My suggestion would be to remove the note about it being a journal entry, to adjust it to say something to the effect of "adapted from the journal of...".

All in all, though, like I said, it's very well written. Well done. Keep writing.

God bless you!
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
20
20
Review of No title  
Review by R. Michael Wood
In affiliation with WdC SuperPower Reviewers Group  
Rated: E | (4.0)
This review is being given on behalf of the WDC Power Reviewers


First Impressions:
I like the comparison you use between what some people treasure vs. yourself. It's a common, but still meaningful contrast.


Rating Issues:
None. This is rated appropriately.


Technical Issues:
The potential use of more punctuation is the only issue that may be present here. That, honestly, is more preference than necessity, though. I would put periods at the end of each line that wasn't a question, but that's me.


Content Issues:
Nothing major here, either. The rhythm and rhyming works very well together. The only problem I see with it lies in your final line. It messes with the rhythm of the rest of the piece. In writing poetry with a set rhythm, make sure you maintain that rhythm through the whole piece.

Also, the lack of a title, while not overly important, does make it a bit less appealing. Even a simple title would be better than simply putting "No Title"


Overall:
I would say well done, as a whole. I can understand what you're talking about, and the symbolism is clear. Keep writing.

God bless you!
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
21
21
Review of The Curse  
Review by R. Michael Wood
In affiliation with WdC SuperPower Reviewers Group  
Rated: E | (2.5)
This review is being given on behalf of the WDC Power Reviewers


First Impressions:
I like the story of redemption you have going on here.


Rating Issues:
Please pay attention here:
You have this rated as an E item. For the most part, that fits, but think of an E rating on here as a G rating in a movie. If it's not appropriate for ANY age reader, it shouldn't be an E. In that regard, a large part of your story has to do with your protagonist killing people. ASR, at the very least.

Technical Issues:

You change from past to present tense quite a bit here. That's a huge issue in writing. It's not only a bad call in the way of grammar, but is extremely distracting to the reader. I suggest going back over this piece very carefully. Read it out loud when you do. Anything that sounds present tense should be changed to past.

The local police was baffled ~ Unless there's only one police officer (in which case you should say "police officer" or something) this should be "were baffled"

in to ~ into works just fine in this instance

learnt ~ learned

Content Issues:
You do a lot of jumping around here. There are a lot of elements that are very difficult to follow, and there isn't really a whole lot of detail given to explain what you're talking about. If you're going to mention something that not everyone understands anyway, I would suggest explaining something of what you're talking about.

The name for the world/continent (you don't really specify what it is) and the name of the city are both very complex. It was difficult to follow the story with those names in there.

Ahanta! ~ So was this an intentional misspelling of his name by the sage?


Overall:
In general, I do like the story. You've certainly got the makings of a very good piece here. I would strongly suggest reading it out loud to help you catch errors you would, otherwise, miss.

Keep writing.

God bless you!
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
22
22
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: E | (3.5)
While I can definitely appreciate the point of view you have with this poem, I don't know that it actually follows itself.

You mention righteousness here. What determines righteousness. Responsibility and self-respect may be noble goals, but I wouldn't qualify them as a measuring stick against righteousness.

Again, I appreciate the acknowledgment that wealth doesn't make for a good measure of success, but if you're measuring success based on righteousness, then you need to determine what righteousness is. For that, I would suggest opening a Bible to seek the source of righteousness.
23
23
Review of Fate  
Review by R. Michael Wood
In affiliation with WdC SuperPower Reviewers Group  
Rated: E | (3.5)
This review is being given on behalf of the WDC Power Reviewers


First Impressions:

I like the way the story runs through the length of their relationship, attaching the beginning with the near end.


Rating Issues:
None. This is appropriately rated. I only put this in here because, well, a lot of people's aren't. *Bigsmile*



Technical Issues:
~I didn't, really, notice a lot of technical issues. It's really well written from that standpoint. I did notice that you seem to have a very sparing use of commas. From a grammatical perspective, they're a lot more common than most people think. Don't be afraid to put them in. Any time a sentence has a break, when someone is being addressed by name or title, you're separating list items or there's an added portion that's not essential to the message of a sentence, are all times to use commas. Hyphens are almost completely unnecessary in writing. You can replace yours with commas.


Content Issues:
~So Clare is fussing and fretting over an arranged marriage. You explain that her mind is occupied, and that she exhausts herself and flops on her bed, but she's still wide awake. Then the queen comes in, reprimands her for being upset and not sleeping, then bam, she goes to sleep the moment her head hits the pillow.

Okay, if Clare wasn't making any noise, why was the queen there? How'd she know she wasn't sleeping?
If she was completely unable to fall asleep before, what changed so dramatically that she was unconscious the moment her head hit the pillow just a minute later? You tell us that she was suddenly exhausted, but that feels like a very simplistic explanation. Why did her mother repeating instructions she'd already been given make her exhausted? It doesn't fit together.

~You use the description of a "red bedspread". Unless you're making a pattern of rhyming, you need to be careful with these types of descriptions. Get more inventive. Use other descriptive words, or just change the color all together.


Overall:

~I would suggest, at least a week after writing, if not a little more, going back over this piece. I think the story works well, but there are just a lot of little issues that could be fixed if you changed your wording a little. Your dialogue is a little dry in some cases. Other times, it's intriguing and involved.

~Also, and I tell this to a lot of writers. Description description description! Picture it like this, you're standing in the middle of this world you've created. Your readers' senses don't function in that world. The only way they know anything about it is by what you tell them. Sights, sounds, smells, actions, etc. All of them mean nothing to your reader if you don't tell them about it. Go overboard, it's okay, I promise!

All in all, like I said, I think you have a good piece of writing. It just needs a little tweaking to get better. Keep writing.

God bless you!
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
24
24
Review of Word's of Wisdom  
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: E | (1.0)
Alright, so your description is longer than the actual piece. I don't see the value in something this short. Could you, please, explain the reasoning to me?

In my mind, it's like reading a thousand word book report on a twenty word children's story. If there's something I missed, please let me know.

God bless you!
25
25
Review of wwww  
Review by R. Michael Wood
Rated: 13+ | (1.0)
I'll admit, when I searched for short pieces, I was definitely not expecting to see one letter writing. Yet, this is the second one I came across. So, I'll ask the same question I did of he other one...

Why? I really do want to know. What's the point?

Please get back with me.

God bless you!
44 Reviews · *Magnify*
Page of 2 · 25 per page   < >
Printed from https://p15.writing.com/main/profile/reviews/deaconmission